Home | Projects | People | Publications | Places |
Arthritis | Bone & Joint | Osteoporosis | Spinal Cord Injury | Stroke | Other |
Principal Investigator: Wendy M. Murray, PhD Co-Principal Investigator: Vincent R. Hentz, MD Investigators: M. Elise Johanson, MS, PT and Niels Smaby, PhD Project Category: Spinal Cord Injury - 2005 Objective: For individuals with cervical spinal cord injury, tendon transfer surgery involves releasing the attachment of a muscle under voluntary control (donor length) and re-attaching it to the tendon of a paralyzed muscle, restoring a function lost to paralysis. Choosing the surgical attachment length of the donor muscle, commonly referred to as "tensioning" the transfer, is considered to be one of the most critical steps in performing the procedure. However, the influence of different attachment lengths on functional outcome has never been directly demonstrated in patients. Currently, surgeons choose surgical attachment lengths based on a number of factors, all related to experience and education. This multi-center study aims to exploit the existing variability in surgical approach and demonstrate for the first time the significance of surgical attachment length on post-operative muscle function. Research Plan: We plan to investigate the influence of surgical approach on outcome with the following hypotheses:
Work Accomplished: We were notified that this project received a fundable score in December 2005. We are currently coordinating human subjects approval at the six sites, and we are awaiting funding to initiate this project. Expected Outcome: This work will provide the first direct evidence that the choice of surgical attachment length affects post-operative muscle function, will form the basis for educating surgeons on the consequences of different surgical techniques, and, ultimately, will improve patient care. Funding Source: VA RR&D Merit Review Funding Status: Pending
|
Previous | Projects | Next |