| [ << ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
By now you should have some familiarity with the inner workings of Pintos. Your OS can properly handle multiple threads of execution with proper synchronization, and can load multiple user programs at once. However, the number and size of programs that can run is limited by the machine's main memory size. In this assignment, you will remove that limitation.
You will build this assignment on top of the last one. Test programs from project 2 should also work with project 3. You should take care to fix any bugs in your project 2 submission before you start work on project 3, because those bugs will most likely cause the same problems in project 3.
You will continue to handle Pintos disks and file systems the same way you did in the previous assignment (see section 3.1.2 Using the File System).
You will work in the vm
directory for this project. The
vm
directory contains only Makefile
s. The only
change from userprog
is that this new Makefile
turns on
the setting -DVM
. All code you write will be in new
files or in files introduced in earlier projects.
You will probably be encountering just a few files for the first time:
devices/block.h
devices/block.c
Careful definitions are needed to keep discussion of virtual memory from being confusing. Thus, we begin by presenting some terminology for memory and storage. Some of these terms should be familiar from project 2 (see section 3.1.4 Virtual Memory Layout), but much of it is new.
A page, sometimes called a virtual page, is a continuous region of virtual memory 4,096 bytes (the page size) in length. A page must be page-aligned, that is, start on a virtual address evenly divisible by the page size. Thus, a 32-bit virtual address can be divided into a 20-bit page number and a 12-bit page offset (or just offset), like this:
31 12 11 0
+-------------------+-----------+
| Page Number | Offset |
+-------------------+-----------+
Virtual Address
|
Each process has an independent set of user (virtual) pages, which
are those pages below virtual address PHYS_BASE, typically
0xc0000000 (3 GB). The set of kernel (virtual) pages, on the
other hand, is global, remaining the same regardless of what thread or
process is active. The kernel may access both user and kernel pages,
but a user process may access only its own user pages. See section 3.1.4 Virtual Memory Layout, for more information.
Pintos provides several useful functions for working with virtual addresses. See section A.6 Virtual Addresses, for details.
A frame, sometimes called a physical frame or a page frame, is a continuous region of physical memory. Like pages, frames must be page-size and page-aligned. Thus, a 32-bit physical address can be divided into a 20-bit frame number and a 12-bit frame offset (or just offset), like this:
31 12 11 0
+-------------------+-----------+
| Frame Number | Offset |
+-------------------+-----------+
Physical Address
|
The 80x86 doesn't provide any way to directly access memory at a physical address. Pintos works around this by mapping kernel virtual memory directly to physical memory: the first page of kernel virtual memory is mapped to the first frame of physical memory, the second page to the second frame, and so on. Thus, frames can be accessed through kernel virtual memory.
Pintos provides functions for translating between physical addresses and kernel virtual addresses. See section A.6 Virtual Addresses, for details.
In Pintos, a page table is a data structure that the CPU uses to
translate a virtual address to a physical address, that is, from a page
to a frame. The page table format is dictated by the 80x86
architecture. Pintos provides page table management code in
pagedir.c
(see section A.7 Page Table).
The diagram below illustrates the relationship between pages and frames. The virtual address, on the left, consists of a page number and an offset. The page table translates the page number into a frame number, which is combined with the unmodified offset to obtain the physical address, on the right.
+----------+
.--------------->|Page Table|---------.
/ +----------+ |
31 | 12 11 0 31 V 12 11 0
+-----------+-------+ +------------+-------+
| Page Nr | Ofs | | Frame Nr | Ofs |
+-----------+-------+ +------------+-------+
Virt Addr | Phys Addr ^
\_____________________________________/
|
A swap slot is a continuous, page-size region of disk space in the swap partition. Although hardware limitations dictating the placement of slots are looser than for pages and frames, swap slots should be page-aligned because there is no downside in doing so.
You will need to design the following data structures:
Enables page fault handling by supplementing the hadrware page table. See section 4.1.4 Managing the Supplemental Page Table.
Allows efficient implementation of eviction policy. See section 4.1.5 Managing the Frame Table.
Tracks usage of swap slots. See section 4.1.6 Managing the Swap Table.
Processes may map files into their virtual memory space. You need a table to track which files are mapped into which pages.
You do not necessarily need to implement four completely distinct data structures: it may be convenient to wholly or partially merge related resources into a unified data structure.
For each data structure, you need to determine what information each element should contain. You also need to decide on the data structure's scope, either local (per-process) or global (applying to the whole system), and how many instances are required within its scope.
To simplify your design, you may store these data structures in non-pageable memory. That means that you can be sure that pointers among them will remain valid.
Possible choices of data structures include arrays, lists, bitmaps, and hash tables. An array is often the simplest approach, but a sparsely populated array wastes memory. Lists are also simple, but traversing a long list to find a particular position wastes time. Both arrays and lists can be resized, but lists more efficiently support insertion and deletion in the middle.
Pintos includes a bitmap data structure in lib/kernel/bitmap.c
and lib/kernel/bitmap.h
. A bitmap is an array of bits, each of
which can be true or false. Bitmaps are typically used to track usage
in a set of (identical) resources: if resource n is in use, then
bit n of the bitmap is true. Pintos bitmaps are fixed in size,
although you could extend their implementation to support resizing.
Pintos also includes a hash table data structure (see section A.8 Hash Table). Pintos hash tables efficiently support insertions and deletions over a wide range of table sizes.
Although more complex data structures may yield performance or other benefits, they may also needlessly complicate your implementation. Thus, we do not recommend implementing any advanced data structure (e.g. a balanced binary tree) as part of your design.
The supplemental page table supplements the page table with additional data about each page. It is needed because of the limitations imposed by the page table's format. Such a data structure is often called a "page table" also; we add the word "supplemental" to reduce confusion.
The supplemental page table is used for at least two purposes. Most importantly, on a page fault, the kernel looks up the virtual page that faulted in the supplemental page table to find out what data should be there. Second, the kernel consults the supplemental page table when a process terminates, to decide what resources to free.
You may organize the supplemental page table as you wish. There are at
least two basic approaches to its organization: in terms of segments or
in terms of pages. Optionally, you may use the page table itself as an
index to track the members of the supplemental page table. You will
have to modify the Pintos page table implementation in pagedir.c
to do so. We recommend this approach for advanced students only.
See section A.7.4.2 Page Table Entry Format, for more information.
The most important user of the supplemental page table is the page fault
handler. In project 2, a page fault always indicated a bug in the
kernel or a user program. In project 3, this is no longer true. Now, a
page fault might only indicate that the page must be brought in from a
file or swap. You will have to implement a more sophisticated page
fault handler to handle these cases. Your page fault handler, which you
should implement by modifying page_fault() in
userprog/exception.c
, needs to do roughly the following:
If the supplemental page table indicates that the user process should not expect any data at the address it was trying to access, or if the page lies within kernel virtual memory, or if the access is an attempt to write to a read-only page, then the access is invalid. Any invalid access terminates the process and thereby frees all of its resources.
If you implement sharing, the data you need may already be in a frame, in which case you must be able to locate that frame.
If you implement sharing, the page you need may already be in a frame, in which case no action is necessary in this step.
userprog/pagedir.c.
The frame table contains one entry for each frame that contains a user page. Each entry in the frame table contains a pointer to the page, if any, that currently occupies it, and other data of your choice. The frame table allows Pintos to efficiently implement an eviction policy, by choosing a page to evict when no frames are free.
The frames used for user pages should be obtained from the "user
pool," by calling palloc_get_page(PAL_USER). You must use
PAL_USER to avoid allocating from the "kernel pool," which
could cause some test cases to fail unexpectedly (see Why PAL_USER?). If you modify palloc.c
as part of your frame table
implementation, be sure to retain the distinction between the two pools.
The most important operation on the frame table is obtaining an unused frame. This is easy when a frame is free. When none is free, a frame must be made free by evicting some page from its frame.
If no frame can be evicted without allocating a swap slot, but swap is full, panic the kernel. Real OSes apply a wide range of policies to recover from or prevent such situations, but these policies are beyond the scope of this project.
The process of eviction comprises roughly the following steps:
Unless you have implemented sharing, only a single page should refer to a frame at any given time.
The evicted frame may then be used to store a different page.
80x86 hardware provides some assistance for implementing page replacement algorithms, through a pair of bits in the page table entry (PTE) for each page. On any read or write to a page, the CPU sets the accessed bit to 1 in the page's PTE, and on any write, the CPU sets the dirty bit to 1. The CPU never resets these bits to 0, but the OS may do so.
You need to be aware of aliases, that is, two (or more) pages that refer to the same frame. When an aliased frame is accessed, the accessed and dirty bits are updated in only one page table entry (the one for the page used for access). The accessed and dirty bits for the other aliases are not updated.
In Pintos, every user virtual page is aliased to its kernel virtual page. You must manage these aliases somehow. For example, your code could check and update the accessed and dirty bits for both addresses. Alternatively, the kernel could avoid the problem by only accessing user data through the user virtual address.
Other aliases should only arise if you implement sharing for extra credit (see VM Extra Credit), or if there is a bug in your code.
See section A.7.3 Accessed and Dirty Bits, for details of the functions to work with accessed and dirty bits.
The swap table tracks in-use and free swap slots. It should allow picking an unused swap slot for evicting a page from its frame to the swap partition. It should allow freeing a swap slot when its page is read back or the process whose page was swapped is terminated.
You may use the BLOCK_SWAP block device for swapping, obtaining
the struct block that represents it by calling block_get_role().
From the
vm/build
directory, use the command pintos-mkdisk swap.dsk
--swap-size=n to create an disk named swap.dsk
that
contains a n-MB swap partition.
Afterward, swap.dsk
will automatically be attached as an extra disk
when you run pintos. Alternatively, you can tell
pintos to use a temporary n-MB swap disk for a single
run with --swap-size=n
.
Swap slots should be allocated lazily, that is, only when they are actually required by eviction. Reading data pages from the executable and writing them to swap immediately at process startup is not lazy. Swap slots should not be reserved to store particular pages.
Free a swap slot when its contents are read back into a frame.
The file system is most commonly accessed with read and
write system calls. A secondary interface is to "map" the file
into virtual pages, using the mmap system call. The program can
then use memory instructions directly on the file data.
Suppose file foo
is 0x1000 bytes (4 kB, or one page) long.
If foo
is mapped into memory starting at address 0x5000, then
any memory accesses to locations 0x5000...0x5fff will access
the corresponding bytes of foo
.
Here's a program that uses mmap to print a file to the console.
It opens the file specified on the command line, maps it at virtual
address 0x10000000, writes the mapped data to the console (fd 1),
and unmaps the file.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <syscall.h>
int main (int argc UNUSED, char *argv[])
{
void *data = (void *) 0x10000000; /* Address at which to map. */
int fd = open (argv[1]); /* Open file. */
mapid_t map = mmap (fd, data); /* Map file. */
write (1, data, filesize (fd)); /* Write file to console. */
munmap (map); /* Unmap file (optional). */
return 0;
}
|
A similar program with full error handling is included as mcat.c
in the examples
directory, which also contains mcp.c
as a
second example of mmap.
Your submission must be able to track what memory is used by memory mapped files. This is necessary to properly handle page faults in the mapped regions and to ensure that mapped files do not overlap any other segments within the process.
We suggest the following initial order of implementation:
process.cto use your frame table allocator.
Do not implement swapping yet. If you run out of frames, fail the allocator or panic the kernel.
After this step, your kernel should still pass all the project 2 test cases.
process.cto record the necessary information in the supplemental page table when loading an executable and setting up its stack. Implement loading of code and data segments in the page fault handler. For now, consider only valid accesses.
After this step, your kernel should pass all of the project 2 functionality test cases, but only some of the robustness tests.
From here, you can implement stack growth, mapped files, and page reclamation on process exit in parallel.
The next step is to implement eviction (see section 4.1.5 Managing the Frame Table). Initially you could choose the page to evict randomly. At this point, you need to consider how to manage accessed and dirty bits and aliasing of user and kernel pages. Synchronization is also a concern: how do you deal with it if process A faults on a page whose frame process B is in the process of evicting? Finally, implement a eviction strategy such as the clock algorithm.
This assignment is an open-ended design problem. We are going to say as little as possible about how to do things. Instead we will focus on what functionality we require your OS to support. We will expect you to come up with a design that makes sense. You will have the freedom to choose how to handle page faults, how to organize the swap partition, how to implement paging, etc.
Before you turn in your project, you must copy the
project 3 design document template into your source tree under the name
pintos/src/vm/DESIGNDOC
and fill it in. We recommend that you
read the design document template before you start working on the
project. See section D. Project Documentation, for a sample design document
that goes along with a fictitious project.
Implement paging for segments loaded from executables. All of these pages should be loaded lazily, that is, only as the kernel intercepts page faults for them. Upon eviction, pages modified since load (e.g. as indicated by the "dirty bit") should be written to swap. Unmodified pages, including read-only pages, should never be written to swap because they can always be read back from the executable.
Implement a global page replacement algorithm that approximates LRU. Your algorithm should perform at least as well as the simple variant of the "second chance" or "clock" algorithm.
Your design should allow for parallelism. If one page fault requires I/O, in the meantime processes that do not fault should continue executing and other page faults that do not require I/O should be able to complete. This will require some synchronization effort.
You'll need to modify the core of the program loader, which is the loop
in load_segment() in userprog/process.c
. Each time around
the loop, page_read_bytes receives the number of bytes to read
from the executable file and page_zero_bytes receives the number
of bytes to initialize to zero following the bytes read. The two always
sum to PGSIZE (4,096). The handling of a page depends on these
variables' values:
page_read_bytes equals PGSIZE, the page should be demand
paged from the underlying file on its first access.
page_zero_bytes equals PGSIZE, the page does not need to
be read from disk at all because it is all zeroes. You should handle
such pages by creating a new page consisting of all zeroes at the
first page fault.
page_read_bytes nor page_zero_bytes
equals PGSIZE. In this case, an initial part of the page is to
be read from the underlying file and the remainder zeroed.
Implement stack growth. In project 2, the stack was a single page at the top of the user virtual address space, and programs were limited to that much stack. Now, if the stack grows past its current size, allocate additional pages as necessary.
Allocate additional pages only if they "appear" to be stack accesses. Devise a heuristic that attempts to distinguish stack accesses from other accesses.
User programs are buggy if they write to the stack below the stack
pointer, because typical real OSes may interrupt a process at any time
to deliver a "signal," which pushes data on the stack.(4)
However, the 80x86 PUSH instruction checks access
permissions before it adjusts the stack pointer, so it may cause a page
fault 4 bytes below the stack pointer. (Otherwise, PUSH would
not be restartable in a straightforward fashion.) Similarly, the
PUSHA instruction pushes 32 bytes at once, so it can fault 32
bytes below the stack pointer.
You will need to be able to obtain the current value of the user
program's stack pointer. Within a system call or a page fault generated
by a user program, you can retrieve it from the esp member of the
struct intr_frame passed to syscall_handler() or
page_fault(), respectively. If you verify user pointers before
accessing them (see section 3.1.5 Accessing User Memory), these are the only cases
you need to handle. On the other hand, if you depend on page faults to
detect invalid memory access, you will need to handle another case,
where a page fault occurs in the kernel. Since the processor only
saves the stack pointer when an exception causes a switch from user
to kernel mode, reading esp out of the struct intr_frame
passed to page_fault() would yield an undefined value, not the
user stack pointer. You will need to arrange another way, such as
saving esp into struct thread on the initial transition
from user to kernel mode.
You should impose some absolute limit on stack size, as do most OSes.
Some OSes make the limit user-adjustable, e.g. with the
ulimit command on many Unix systems. On many GNU/Linux systems,
the default limit is 8 MB.
The first stack page need not be allocated lazily. You can allocate and initialize it with the command line arguments at load time, with no need to wait for it to be faulted in.
All stack pages should be candidates for eviction. An evicted stack page should be written to swap.
Implement memory mapped files, including the following system calls.
Your VM system must lazily load pages in mmap regions and use the
mmaped file itself as backing store for the mapping. That is,
evicting a page mapped by mmap writes it back to the file it was
mapped from.
If the file's length is not a multiple of PGSIZE, then some
bytes in the final mapped page "stick out" beyond the end of the
file. Set these bytes to zero when the page is faulted in from the
file system,
and discard them when the page is written back to disk.
If successful, this function returns a "mapping ID" that uniquely identifies the mapping within the process. On failure, it must return -1, which otherwise should not be a valid mapping id, and the process's mappings must be unchanged.
A call to mmap may fail if the file open as fd has a
length of zero bytes. It must fail if addr is not page-aligned
or if the range of pages mapped overlaps any existing set of mapped
pages, including the stack or pages mapped at executable load time.
It must also fail if addr is 0, because some Pintos code assumes
virtual page 0 is not mapped. Finally, file descriptors 0 and 1,
representing console input and output, are not mappable.
mmap by the same
process that has not yet been unmapped.
All mappings are implicitly unmapped when a process exits, whether via
exit or by any other means. When a mapping is unmapped, whether
implicitly or explicitly, all pages written to by the process are
written back to the file, and pages not written must not be. The pages
are then removed from the process's list of virtual pages.
Closing or removing a file does not unmap any of its mappings. Once
created, a mapping is valid until munmap is called or the process
exits, following the Unix convention. See Removing an Open File, for
more information. You should use the file_reopen function to
obtain a separate and independent reference to the file for each of
its mappings.
If two or more processes map the same file, there is no requirement that
they see consistent data. Unix handles this by making the two mappings
share the same physical page, but the mmap system call also has
an argument allowing the client to specify whether the page is shared or
private (i.e. copy-on-write).
While accessing user memory, your kernel must either be prepared to handle
such page faults, or it must prevent them from occurring. The kernel
must prevent such page faults while it is holding resources it would
need to acquire to handle these faults. In Pintos, such resources include
locks acquired by the device driver(s) that control the device(s) containing
the file system and swap space. As a concrete example, you must not
allow page faults to occur while a device driver accesses a user buffer
passed to file_read, because you would not be able to invoke
the driver while handling such faults.
Preventing such page faults requires cooperation between the code within which the access occurs and your page eviction code. For instance, you could extend your frame table to record when a page contained in a frame must not be evicted. (This is also referred to as "pinning" or "locking" the page in its frame.) Pinning restricts your page replacement algorithm's choices when looking for pages to evict, so be sure to pin pages no longer than necessary, and avoid pinning pages when it is not necessary.
Here's a summary of our reference solution, produced by the
diffstat program. The final row gives total lines inserted
and deleted; a changed line counts as both an insertion and a deletion.
This summary is relative to the Pintos base code, but the reference solution for project 3 starts from the reference solution to project 2. See section 3.4 FAQ, for the summary of project 2.
The reference solution represents just one possible solution. Many other solutions are also possible and many of those differ greatly from the reference solution. Some excellent solutions may not modify all the files modified by the reference solution, and some may modify files not modified by the reference solution.
Makefile.build | 4 devices/timer.c | 42 ++ threads/init.c | 5 threads/interrupt.c | 2 threads/thread.c | 31 + threads/thread.h | 37 +- userprog/exception.c | 12 userprog/pagedir.c | 10 userprog/process.c | 319 +++++++++++++----- userprog/syscall.c | 545 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- userprog/syscall.h | 1 vm/frame.c | 162 +++++++++ vm/frame.h | 23 + vm/page.c | 297 ++++++++++++++++ vm/page.h | 50 ++ vm/swap.c | 85 ++++ vm/swap.h | 11 17 files changed, 1532 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-) |
Yes.
Extra credit may be available if you implement page sharing (some classes offer extra credit and some don't; check your class-specific information to see if extra credit is available). Page sharing means that if multiple processes use the same executable file, read-only pages (such as code pages) can be shared among those processes instead of creating separate copies for each process. If you carefully designed your data structures, sharing of read-only pages should not make this part significantly harder.
Returning from page_fault() resumes the current user process
(see section A.4.2 Internal Interrupt Handling).
It will then retry the instruction to which the instruction pointer points.
You might notice that, in the stack growth tests, the user program faults
on an address that is above the user program's current stack pointer,
even though the PUSH and PUSHA instructions would cause
faults 4 and 32 bytes below the current stack pointer.
This is not unusual. The PUSH and PUSHA instructions are
not the only instructions that can trigger user stack growth.
For instance, a user program may allocate stack space by decrementing the
stack pointer using a SUB $n, %esp instruction, and then use a
MOV ..., m(%esp) instruction to write to a stack location within
the allocated space that is m bytes above the current stack pointer.
Such accesses are perfectly valid, and your kernel must grow the
user program's stack to allow those accesses to succeed.
No. The size of the data segment is determined by the linker. We still have no dynamic allocation in Pintos (although it is possible to "fake" it at the user level by using memory-mapped files). Supporting data segment growth should add little additional complexity to a well-designed system.
PAL_USER for allocating page frames?
Passing PAL_USER to palloc_get_page() causes it to allocate
memory from the user pool, instead of the main kernel pool. Running out
of pages in the user pool just causes user programs to page, but running
out of pages in the kernel pool will cause many failures because so many
kernel functions need to obtain memory.
You can layer some other allocator on top of palloc_get_page() if
you like, but it should be the underlying mechanism.
Also, you can use the -ul
kernel command-line option to limit
the size of the user pool, which makes it easy to test your VM
implementation with various user memory sizes.
| [ << ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |