Chemical Literature (Chem 184/284)
University of California at Santa Barbara
Lecture 1: Overview of the Organization of Information
Why a full-quarter course on chemical information?
- Because the subject is HUGE…
- For example: Chemical Abstracts
- Indexes 14,000 journal titles, plus patents, conferences, reports, dissertations, etc.
- Adds over 500,000 citations and 700,000 substance records per year.
- From 1907 to present, over 13 million citations and 14 million substances indexed.
Information as a physical entity
- Information can be treated as a thermodynamic system, subject to entropy (described by Claude Shannon)
- The organization of raw data turns it into information—the better organized, the more value added.
- Organization can be added at many levels…including the ultimate user.
- End-user information processing puts the information in its final form for use. A new
task each time—stoichiometric
- Information professionals try to create organization in ways that can be used by many
people—catalytic
Types of scientific literature
- PRIMARY—The original publication of data: journals, patents, technical reports
conferences, dissertations, some books.
- SECONDARY—Publications which provide access to the primary literature: reviews,
indexes, abstracts, data collections, etc.
Approaches to organizing the scientific literature
- Classification and Data Collection—physically grouping related
data by some common element.
- Indexing—creating pointers to the original literature based on
some piece of information in the original, e.g. author names or subject terms.
Classification & Data Collection
- Libraries use classification schemes to group related books together for browsing by
subject. In the Library of Congress system, chemistry materials fall under QD.
- Data collections bring information from various primary sources for easier location,
e.g. the CRC handbook series.
Indexing for Subject Access
- Some indexes use keywords from the original; others use standard subject vocabularies.
- In US libraries, terms are assigned from the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH).
- MEDLINE uses the Medical Subject Headings (MESH).
- Chemical Abstracts uses its Index Guide.
Tradeoffs in information access
- All information organization and retrieval involves tradeoffs
- Specificity vs. collation
- Relevance vs. recall
- Maximum precision vs. maximum quantity
- Specific headings avoid the irrelevant
- General headings bring like items together.
- Searching narrowly avoids having to look at irrelevant items at the cost of missing some
relevant material.
- Searching broadly helps insure that nothing is missed, but may require later screening to
eliminate irrelevancies.
- The information professional has to decide how best to meet the needs of the intended
audience with the available technology.
- The information user has to set priorities based on the ultimate objective and the time,
labor and money available for searching.
- Together, they evolve the strategy needed for extracting needed information from the
universe of scientific publication.
The Iterative Approach to Literature Searching
- Comprehensive subject searches can be tough.
- Start with what you know—a subject term, an author, a known reference…
- Find an initial set of relevant answers.
- Review those answers for new clues.
- From these, repeat the cycle until satisfied.
This page created by
Chuck Huber (huber@library.ucsb.edu).