Character-based Surprisal as a Model of Human Reading in the Presence of Errors (bibtex)
by Michael Hahn, Frank Keller, Yonatan Bisk, Yonatan Belinkov
Abstract:
Intuitively, human readers cope easily with errors in text; typos, misspelling, word substitutions, etc. do not unduly disrupt natural reading. Previous work indicates that letter transpositions result in increased reading times, but it is unclear if this effect generalizes to more natural errors. In this paper, we report an eye-tracking study that compares two error types (letter transpositions and naturally occurring misspelling) and two error rates (10% or 50% of all words contain errors). We find that human readers show unimpaired comprehension in spite of these errors, but error words cause more reading difficulty than correct words. Also, transpositions are more difficult than misspellings, and a high error rate increases difficulty for all words, including correct ones. We then present a computational model that uses character-based (rather than traditional word-based) surprisal to account for these results. The model explains that transpositions are harder than misspellings because they contain unexpected letter combinations. It also explains the error rate effect: upcoming words are more difficultto predict when the context is degraded, leading to increased surprisal.
Reference:
Character-based Surprisal as a Model of Human Reading in the Presence of Errors (Michael Hahn, Frank Keller, Yonatan Bisk, Yonatan Belinkov), In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci), 2019.
Bibtex Entry:
@INPROCEEDINGS{Hahn-etal-2019-arxiv,
  author    = {Michael Hahn and
               Frank Keller and Yonatan Bisk and Yonatan Belinkov},
  title     = {Character-based Surprisal as a Model of Human Reading in the Presence of Errors},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci)},
  year      = {2019},
  url = {https://cogsci.mindmodeling.org/2019/papers/0089/0089.pdf},
  preprint       = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.00595},
  github = {https://github.com/m-hahn/reading-noise},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  eprint    = {1902.00595},
  abstract = {Intuitively, human readers cope easily with errors in text; typos, misspelling, word substitutions, etc. do not unduly disrupt natural reading. Previous work indicates that letter transpositions result in increased reading times, but it is unclear if this effect generalizes to more natural errors. In this paper, we report an eye-tracking study that compares two error types (letter transpositions and naturally occurring misspelling) and two error rates (10% or 50% of all words contain errors). We find that human readers show unimpaired comprehension in spite of these errors, but error words cause more reading difficulty than correct words. Also, transpositions are more difficult than misspellings, and a high error rate increases difficulty for all words, including correct ones. We then present a computational model that uses character-based (rather than traditional word-based) surprisal to account for these results. The model explains that transpositions are harder than misspellings because they contain unexpected letter combinations. It also explains the error rate effect: upcoming words are more difficultto predict when the context is degraded, leading to increased surprisal.}
}
Powered by bibtexbrowser