| Atlanta Constitution, 3/9/02 | Baltimore American, 4/19/02 | Baltimore Sun, 4/10/02, 5/15/02 | | Book Buyer, 5/02 | Book News, 5/02 | Bookseller, 9/02 | Boston Evening Transcript, 4/23/02 | | Boston Times, 5/8/02 | Christian Register, 3/6/02 | Critic, 10/02 | Dallas Morning News, 3/31/02 | Dial, 6/1/02 | | Eclectic Magazine of Foreign Literature, 5/02 | Ecclesiastical Review, 8/02 | Era, 8/02 | | European Years, 10/11 (3/2/03) | Evangelist and Religious Review, 4/3/02 | Hartford Courant, 4/30/04 | | Independent, 5/1/02 | Literary Boston of To-Day, 8/02 | Literary News, 5/02 | Living Age, 3/29/02 | | London Quarterly Review, 4/09 | Louisville Post, 6?/02 | Medical Century, 5/1/02 | Morning Herald, 3/30/02 | | Nation, 5/22/02 | New Age, 8/2/02 | New England Stationer and Printer, 4/02 | | New York Evening Telegram, 3/29/02 | New York Observer and Chronicle, 4/10/02 | New York Sun, 3/29/02 | | New York Times, 3/1/02, 5/3/02, 5/17/02 | New-York Tribune, 2/8/02 | Outlook, 9/6/02 | | Overland Monthly and Out West, 6/02 | Philadelphia Record, 3/29/02 | Publishers’ Weekly, 1/31/03 | | Richmond Times, 6/8/02 | San Francisco Chronicle, 4/12/02 | Saturday Review, 8/30/02 | | Springfield Republican, 3/10/02, 4/6/02, 4/15/02 | Washington Post, 3/17/02 | Watchman, 4/3/02 | | Worcester Spy, 3/9/02, 4/6/02 | World, 3/22/02 | World’s Work, 5/02 | These contemporary reviews of Mary Tappan Wright’s Aliens are reproduced complete, with both positive and negative judgments intact, in the order of their original publication. Note that as products of their time they reflect the prejudices of their authors, both conscious and unconscious, when discussing the relations of Anglo- and African-Americans, and utilize terms and descriptions in reference to the latter that would be considered inflamatory today. In the interest of historical accuracy this material is presented exactly as originally published—the sole exception being in the instance of words now regarded as profanity, which are elided. —BPK, March 17, 2008. As of the latest update, this page features 53 reviews. —BPK, May 18, 2017.
<— New-York Tribune, February 8, 1902, page 10:
CURRENT TALK OF THINGS PRESENT
There is one period of recent Southern history, that between the years of reconstruction and the “New South” of the present, that has hitherto escaped the attention of the novelist. This is the period in which Mrs. Mary Tappan Wright has placed her novel, “Aliens,” that the Scribners have in preparation. It tells of a group of Northern people who go into the heart of the South, and is a study of the social conditions and of the play of character of the Northern and Southern people in contact. Mrs. Wright, who is the wife of Professor John Henry Wright, professor of Greek and dean of the Graduate School of Harvard, wrote “A Truce, and Other Short Stories,” that appeared not long ago.
<— New York Evening Telegram, March?, 1902, page ?:
Novel of the South A L I E N S “An admirable novel—a more than ordinarily clever study of manners and customs.”—NEW YORK EVENING TELEGRAM.
Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York [from a Scribner’s display ad in the New-York Tribune, March 29, 1902, page 10; complete review will be posted when located]
<— New York Sun, March?, 1902, page ?:
Novel of the South A L I E N S
“THERE is nothing historical about it, no idea of instruction or of serving any cause, just a plain story, a vivid description of an unusually interesting bit of contemporary American life, that somehow, almost incidentally, brings home the real troubles of the South, so that they are not easily forgotten.”
Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York [from a Scribner’s display ad in the New-York Tribune, March 29, 1902, page 10; complete review will be posted when located]
<— Philadelphia Record, March?, 1902, page ?:
Novel of the South A L I E N S “The Southern types, with the subtle effects of social and political traditions, are portrayed with insight and power.”—Philadelphia Record.
Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York [from a Scribner’s display ad in the New-York Tribune, March 29, 1902, page 10; complete review will be posted when located]
<— New York Times, March 1, 1902, page BR12: NOTES AND NEWS. “Aliens, a Novel of Contemporary Life in the South,” by Mary Tappan Wright, which will come from the press of Charles Scribner’s Sons next week, deals with social and political conditions south of the Mason and Dixon line during the period of reconstruction, and up to the time of the birth of the new South. The author is the wife of Prof. Wright of Harvard, and her father, Prof. Tappan, was at one time President of Kenyon College, Ohio.
<— The Christian Register, March 6, 1902, page 285:
Mary Tappan Wright, whose novel of southern life, Aliens, is soon to be published by the Scribners, is the wife of Professor John H. Wright of Harvard University, the dean of the graduate department and professor of Greek. Aliens deals with that extremely interesting period of Southern recovery, neglected in fiction, immediately following reconstruction,—a period and environment of which Mrs. Wright is well fitted to write by reason of long residence in the South. This is her first long novel, but she is a successful writer of shorter fiction.
<— The Atlanta Constitution, March 9, 1902, page A10: IN THE LITERARY WORLD “Aliens, a Novel of Contemporary Life in the South,” by Mary Tappan Wright, which will come from the press of Charles Scribner’s Sons next week, deals with social and political conditions south of the Mason and Dixon line during the period of reconstruction, and up to the time of the birth of the new south. The author is the wife of Professor Wright, of Harvard, and her father, Professor Tappan, was at one time president of Kenyon College, Ohio.
<— Worcester Daily Spy, March 9, 1902, page 12:
LITERARY NOTES Mary Tappan Wright, whose very strong novel of Southern life, “Aliens,” is soon to be published by the Scribners, is the wife of Professor John H. Wright of Harvard University, the dean of the graduate department and professor of Greek. She and her husband are well known in the society of Cambridge, where they have lived for years. Mrs. Wright comes of the well-known Tappan family of Ohio, her father having been president of Kenyon College. She was born in Steubenville. “Aliens” deals with that extremely interesting period of Southern recovery, so neglected in fiction, immediately following reconstruction, a period and environment of which Mrs. Wright is well fitted to write by reason of long residence in the South. This is her first long novel, but she is a successful writer of shorter fiction, her stories having appeared chiefly in Scribner’s Magazine and the Atlantic. —
<— Springfield Daily Republican, March 10, 1902, page 5:
NOTES AMONG THE PUBLISHERS. — NEW AND FORTHCOMING BOOKS. — A Wide Variety of Reading for the Spring Season. . . . Mary Tappan Wright, whose novel of Southern life, “Aliens,” is soon to be published by this house, [Scribner’s] is the wife of Prof John H. Wright of Harvard university, the dean of the graduate department and professor of Greek. Mrs. Wright comes of the well-known Tappan family of Ohio, her father having been president of Kenyon College. She was born in Steubenville, O. . . .
<— The Washington Post, March 17, 1902, page 9:
ALIENS. By Mary Tappan Wright. New York:
Charles Scribner’s Sons. Washington: Ballantyne
& Sons. $1.50.
<— The World, March 22, 1902, page 8:
NEWS &
VIEWS OF
BOOKS
AMONG FRESH WORKS OF FICTION. “The Strollers” and a Mid-Century America—A Romance Involving the Real Alexander Hamilton—New Story of the Color Line.
ALIENS.—By Mary Tappan Wright.
(Charles Scribner’s Sons.)
<— The Living Age, March 29, 1902, page 823:
BOOKS AND AUTHORS.
Mary Tappan Wright, author of the novel “Aliens” which is on the list of the Scribners for early publication, is the wife of Professor John H. Wright of Harvard University. Her story deals with southern life in the later reconstruction period and is the fruit of personal observation. This is Mrs. Wright’s first long novel, but she has an agreeable reputation as a writer of short stories.
<— The Morning Herald (Lexington, Ky.), March 30, 1902, page 18:
BOOK REVIEW
Aliens. Mary Tappen [sic] Wright. Charles
Scribner’s Sons: New York, 1902.— Aliens is a very disagreeable and quite powerful story of contemporary life in a southern college town. The theme is the difference between the people and conditions, the standards, traditions and ideals of a small community in the South and those of a northern community of the same relative size and importance—a difference so great that when a girl, a product of the northern life, is transplanted in the southern environment she finds herself an outlander. The social and to a certain extent the political conditions are portrayed with a vividness that is almost graphic. The story runs somewhat as follows: Helen Prescott, of the northern college town, marries the northern student now for more than a decade a professor in the little southern college. She does so without pretending to love him, but because of a Quixotic notion that the mild feeling of respect she feels for him is a better foundation for enduring happiness than a romantic attachment would prove. Going with him to his adopted home, at a time of unusual excitement because of the proposition to remove the college to the capital of the State, she finds herself wholly unable to comprehend the situation or cope with the emergency which soon arises. The theme is an interesting one, and the reader can only regret that it is not handled with a more skillful hand. If Helen had had a sympathetic heart, if she had seen anything outside the range of her own narrow experience, if she had gained admission to her husband’s life, the barrier between her and the community would have been either broken down or comprehensible. But as she remains an alien in her husband’s development as as well as in the community life, the theme fails of illustration. The presentation is unjust, too, to both sides. Just as the pettiness, the sordidness, the self-satisfaction, the vulgarity of the little southern town are presented in exaggerated fashion, so the hardness and unconscious selfishness, the obtuseness of the heroine misrepresent the present day education of the North. Men and women of Helen’s type are strangers and foreigners wherever unselfish and comprehending sympathy are demanded. In spite, however, of faults in plot, construction and uncertainty in character drawing, the attention of the reader is held and there remain some vivid impressions of an alluring, if desolate, country.
<— Dallas Morning News, March 31, 1902, page 3:
“Aliens,” by Mary Tappan Wright. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York.
<— New England Stationer and Printer, April, 1902, page 58:
PUBLICATIONS
CHARLES SCRIBNER’S SONS’ SPRING
<— Evangelist and Religious Review, April 3, 1902, pages 191-192: In Aliens10, by Mary Tappan Wright, we have another of the novels of Southern life which bid fair to rival in numbers, at least, the historical romances. This one seems to us decidedly worth while. It is a careful, sympathetic, but unprejudiced exposition of present conditions in a typical Southern village. Although apparently not written with a view to the betterment of such conditions nor with a suggestion as to the solution of the many problems, the book nevertheless is suggestive, since it throws so vivid a light on the social life and to a certain extent on the political life. One feels the hold of tradition upon the people, the subtle influences of climate and of the relations between the two races, “the spirit of the land.” The Northern woman finds herself an alien in this South, “huge, remote, unintelligible,” With its “hospitable, warm-hearted but intensely Prejudiced people,” and is continually “in the certainty of her Northern theories, blundering over Southern facts.” The Southern types are all here; the “perfect gentleman” who has no qualms about shooting an unarmed man or insulting women whose only offense is that they teach negro children; the charming witty Southern belle; the young gallants who make love as easily and of as great necessity as they breathe; the colored people and many others, all the products, hateful and lovely, good and evil, of such a civilization. The descriptions are very beautiful; nature is often symbolically interpreted. “With us the trees seem to live,” says the Northern woman. “Even in the bare frost of our Februarys, they aspire; your trees sway forever in steady, despairing patience, mournful and dark, always blocking the horizon, waiting, but without hope. . . . it may be for expiation, as for the time of mourning to pass; perhaps for the uneasy giant to awake.” This is a strong story, picturesque, keen and full of dramatic incident. 10Aliens. By Mary Tappan Wright. Charles Scribner’s Sons. 1902. $1.50.
<— The Watchman, April 3, 1902, page 16:
“Aliens”: A Story of North and South. By Mary Tappan Wright. It is refreshing to turn from the ever-present historical novel, and the “problem” novel of fashionable society, to a story of our own day and country, but one which reveals a condition of society as stranger as that of another people and civilization. A Northern woman of exceptional education, refinement and culture, marries a Northern man who for ten years or more has been a professor in a Southern college, and the story opens with the termination of their wedding journey and the bride’s introduction to her new home. The book deals almost entirely with the social conditions of life in the South, touching political issues only as they affect the relations of society. Mrs. Wright’s work suggests a pen and ink sketch—every stroke tells; there is not a superfluous line in the book. The characters are sharply drawn, and reveal varied individualities in conversations amusing, exasperating, often amazing from our point of view, but never dull. The descriptions of scene and environment are terse but picturesque, leaving the details of local color to be felt. The story moves rapidly with dramatic force and increasing interest to the end. Mrs. Wright is the wife of Prof. Wright of Harvard, and the author of “A Truce, and Other Tales.” In “Aliens” she has achieved more than a successful novel—it is a book to be remembered. (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. Pp. 424. $1.50.)
<— Springfield Sunday Republican, April 6, 1902, page 19:
BOOKS, AUTHORS AND ARTS
An interesting novel, which will probably
be received with scant grace in the South,
and the complete fairness of which it is
possible even for a northerner to doubt, is
“The Alien” [sic] (Scribners), by Mary Tappan
Wright, whose previous book, “A Truce
and Other Stories,” attracted no little attention.
The scene is an old-fashioned college
town, the precise location of which is
not indicated, and at the outset of the
story Prof Thurston, a northerner, who
had been a member of the faculty so long
as almost to be adopted, is just returning
with his northern bride, a brilliant but not
an adaptable woman. The author represents
vividly her disgust at almost everything
she sees—the negroes and the way
the negroes are treated; the shiftless life
and the enervating atmosphere, and most
of all the petty gossip which concerns itself
chiefly with the love affairs of young
people. Flirtation and scandal seem to be
the chief recreations, with dueling, murder
and lynching for more exciting moments.— A STORY OF THE SOUTH. — As for characters, there is a brilliant young southern novelist, who is a tremendous flirt and is regarded by all the girls as a beau ideal, an ambitious storekeeper of second-grade society, who keeps a convict gang, a malevolent and sneaking professor named Yarnell, who is trying to oust Prof Thurston from his chair, a volatile young newspaper editor named Brinton, and a highly flirtatious southern belle, Zoe Mason, with whom southern critics of the book will probably find most fault. There seems little doubt that she is true to life; in her conception of life as in her dialect; the more important question is whether she is typical. Then there are a number of northern people who hardly count, as they belong to the negro mission, and are therefore ostracised, in spite of the fact that in family and education they are the equals of any families in the place. The justice of the picture may be left to the discussion of those concerned: as to the essential interest and vitality of the novel there can be no question, except for the fact that the author has unnecessarily emphasized the unpleasant portions of the narrative, and especially the little bickerings between Mrs Thurston and her husband, a well-meaning but rather cold and pedantic man. The point is that there is enough that is ugly in the story without bringing in needless domestic squabbles, which always make depressing reading.
<— Worcester Sunday Spy, April 6, 1902, page 6:
THE WORLD OF BOOKS
ALIENS.— By Mary Tappan Wright. (Charles Scribner’s Sons.)
This is a novel of contemporary life
in the South. It is not exactly a problem
book, although the title itself indicates
what the characters of the
book seem to prove. A Northern woman
in the South finds herself in a
new civilization. The social conditions
of the North and South as depicted
here are totally different and the viewpoints
of the people are yet more different.
The story cannot be considered
apart from these facts because it
all depends upon the life of the young
woman who marries a professor in a
small Southern college.
<— New York Observer and Chronicle, April 10, 1902, page 468:
“Aliens.” A Novel of North and South. By Mary Tappan
Wright. Charles Scribner’s Sons. $1.50.
<— The Baltimore Sun, April 10, 1902, page 8: The Aliens. [sic] By Mary Tappan Wright. (8x5, pp. 424. $1.50.) Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York. [Cushing, Baltimore.] We sincerely regret the publication of this book. The regret is personal in that “The Aliens” [sic] presents to the public a writer capable of good work in a false position. Those unacquainted with Mary Tappan Wright would from “The Aliens” [sic] consider her unfair and we might well add uninformed. There would be ground, too, for considering this author to be animated by a hatred for the South and filled with a desire to put the negro in the place of the white man. This misunderstanding of the talented author, who, we are confident, is as sincere as she is unjust, is certainly to be regretted. We are grieved that Mrs. Wright should have given to the world another of those unfair books that have done so much to keep alive sectional antagonisms. Judging her book carefully and without regard for any personal good feeling that we may have for its author, we say: “The Aliens” [sic] is a libel upon Southern society of today. It is written in the spirit of one of those Northern women who consort with negroes in the mission schools of the South. It is full of misstatements that are seemingly told with the purpose of creating prejudice and aiding the sale of the book as an anti-Southern document. The harm that such a book as “The Aliens” [sic] may do is happily limited by its circulation, but unhappily that circulation is among persons with prejudice already developed, and therefore errors will pass unquestioned because in line with the thought of the reader. We are certain that this book deserves only the contempt and neglect of every Southerner.
<— The San Francisco Chronicle, April 12, 1902, page 8:
SOME RECENT BOOKS Fatigue and excitement combined to make this great belt of cotton and color seem accursed, under a ban, unspeakably desolate in its lazy, hopeless unthrift; and the vast, melancholy plantations; the tragic tangles of cane and creeper; the blighted trees floating with ghostly moss; the scattered, squalid cabins; the blood-red gashes in the earth; the startling green of the pines and the heavy foliage of the mournful horizon—all inspired her with something little short of terror. The husband, who is aptly hit off in the phrase “A man who had never come up,” fails to arouse more than pity for his lack of perception and his faculty of retreating into an impenetrable thicket of egoism at the very moment when a comprehending smile would have lit the pathway over the morass. Aside from the woes of the Thurstons—home-made, like most woes—the best the book has to offer is its study of such a phase of the racial and social problem as may be inferred from the presence of a few self-sacrificing men and women from the North in a wholly unreadjusted community of Southerners, still steeped to the lips in the prejudice of color and caste, striving for the moral and mental enlargement of the “man and brother,” and yet hungering, however vainly, for some companionship of their own blood. Trenholm, the leading man of the subordinate action, is that unlovely thing, a practical male flirt, a poseur, selfish, cruel and banal in all his manifestations. All in all, the picture of Tallawara and its people is depressingly somber, unrelieved by any gleam of hope or promise. (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons: price $1.50.)
<— Springfield Daily Republican, April 15, 1902, page 13:
WITHIN THE SPHERE OF LETTERS. — NOTES OF BOOKS AND AUTHORS. — A Novel That Displeases the South. When Mrs Mary Tappan Wright's new novel, “The Aliens,” [sic] was recently reviewed in these columns, the opinion was expressed that it would be received very badly in the South. This seems to prove to be the case. The Baltimore Sun, which is keenly sensitive to national lines in fiction, says:— We sincerely regret the publication of this book. The regret is personal in that “The Aliens” [sic] presents to the public a writer capable of good work in a false position. Those unacquainted with Mary Tappen [sic] Wright would from “The Aliens” [sic] consider her unfair and we might well add uninformed. There would be ground, too, for considering this author to be animated by a hatred for the South and filled with a desire to put the negro in the place of the white man. This misunderstanding of the talented author, who, we are confident, is as sincere as she is unjust, is certainly to be regretted. We are grieved that Mrs Wright should have given to the world another of those unfair books that have done so much to keep alive sectional antagonisms. Judging her book carefully and without regard for any personal good feeling that we may have for its author, we say “The Aliens” [sic] is a libel upon southern society of to-day. It is written in the spirit of one of those northern women who consort with negroes in the mission schools of the South. It is full of misstatements that are seemingly told with the purpose of creating prejudice and aiding the sale of the book as an anti-southern document. The harm that such a book as “The Aliens” [sic] may do is happily limited by the circulation, but unhappily that circulation is among persons with prejudice already developed, and therefore errors will pass unquestioned because in line with the thought of the reader. We are certain that this book deserves only the contempt and neglect of every southerner.
<— Baltimore American, April 19, 1902, page 10:
“Aliens.” By Mary Tappan Wright. This is a novel of contemporary life in the South, dealing with social and to a slight extent with political conditions, dramatic in movement and full of picturesque color. The title of the novel indicates the point of view, namely, that the social conditions are still quite by themselves, and that the Northern woman finds herself in s civilization almost as strange to her as any outside her own race. The Southern types, with the subtle effects of social and political traditions, are portrayed with unusual vigor. Published by Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, and for sale by B. B. Eichelberger, Baltimore.
<— Boston Evening Transcript, April 23, 1902, page 19:
Aliens
“Aliens,” in which Mary Tappan Wright
portrays with great exactness certain
phases of marital conditions, is in many
ways a distinctive contribution to modern
imaginative literature. The average reader
will find nothing exciting or emotionally
moving in is pages, but the student of
the psychological novel with welcome it
for the insight given into the workings of
the feminine mind during a period of storm
and stress. Although the story is called
“a novel of North and South,” its environment
is merely incidental; the same woman
under different conditions would have been
similarly moved. Purely as a story Mrs.
Wright has written nothing out of the
common order; her success consists in the
power of her analysis of human character
and conduct. Her heroine is a newly married
woman who goes with her husband to
the little Southern college town in which
he is teaching, and after a year of struggling
against his self-absorption, growing
indifference and the monotony of the life
about her, she succumbs to the inevitable.
The character analysis is utterly from the
woman’s point of view, but as that point
is too frequently neglected in fiction, Mrs.
Wright is to be congratulated upon her
adherence to it.
<— The Book Buyer, a Review and Record of Current Literature, May 1902, pages 315-316:
“A QUESTION OF LATITUDES.”
THE larger motive predominates in
Mrs. Mary Tappan Wright’s “novel
of North and South,” Aliens, and this is
well, for, working inward, the reader
grasps more firmly the meaning of the
book. It is not only the social differences
which make the Northerner an alien in
the Southland; the temperamental divergence
of which they are the outward
manifestation is much more vital to a
full understanding of the problem. The
Southern novelist of this story, who in a
Northern atmosphere appears far different
from his own real self, to reassume
it the moment he returns among his
people, is a deft psychological expression
of this temperamental difference; and, in
a lighter way, Zöe Mason, the flirtatious,
clever girl of the South, with her band of
admirers, all of whom she keeps in uncertainty,
is skilfully made to aid in carrying
the analysis home. “It is all a question
of latitudes,” said Numa Roumestan,
of the Méridional; and “it is all a question
of latitudes,” we may well repeat in
reading this searching study of the divergences
between our own North and
South. A. Schade van
Westrum.
ALIENS: A STORY OF NORTH AND SOUTH. By Mary Tappan Wright. Charles Scribner’s Sons, 12mo. $150.
<— Book News, a Monthly Survey of General Literature, May 1902, pages 738, 678-679:
Aliens. By Mary Tappan
Wright, author
of “A Truce and Other Stories.” 424 pp. 12mo.
This is a somewhat strange tale in
which characterization is the essential
feature. The psychological study
presents a number of difficult and interesting
problems, the attempt to
solve which would require some extended
knowledge, and in all probabilities
would lead up to stirring controversy.
The story deals with contemporary
life in the South, giving an
able delineation of the social and political
conditions existing there. On
the social side particularly, the author
enlarges, introducing many pretty
and piquant scenes as well as more
serious and impressive situations. A
large number of diversifying phases
of human nature are set forth, the
negro character being skilfully included.
<— Eclectic Magazine of Foreign Literature, May 1902, page 699:
Mary Tappan Wright, author of the novel “Aliens” which is on the list of the Scribners for early publication, is the wife of Professor John H. Wright of Harvard University. Her story deals with southern life in the later reconstruction period and is the fruit of personal observation. This is Mrs. Wright's first long novel, but she has an agreeable reputation as a writer of short stories.
<— The Literary News, May 1902, pages 140-141:
IT takes uncommon qualities to mark out
a story in the legion of eminently respectable
romances and novels that has been let loose
upon us. “Aliens: a novel of North and
South,” by Mrs. Mary Tappan Wright, may
never be advertised as selling in its 300th
thousand, but it will be enjoyed by all who
read it and will make some of them think.
There is nothing historical about it, no idea
of instruction or of serving any cause, just
a plain story, a vivid description of an unusually
interesting bit of contemporary American
life, that somehow, almost incidentally,
brings home the real troubles of the South,
so that they are not easily forgotten.
<— The World's Work, May 1902, page 2122:
A SHORT GUIDE TO NEW BOOKS RECENT FICTION
The Aliens [sic]
<— The Independent, May 1, 1902, page 1075:
FROM “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” and its
literary progeny the pendulum of popularity
has swung of late years to the opposite
end of its arc. A new sort of
“sectional” novel has come into fashion,
where the Southerner appears as the exponent
of most of the virtues, and if exigencies
of plot demand the bestowal of a
few on a Northerner, it is commonly a
girl, represented as a flower which has
bloomed inexplicably from unpromising
soil, born of, but not resembling, a mother
connected with some Massachusetts
Freedman’s Aid Society, and a “carpet-bagger”
father. *ALIENS. By Mary Tappan Wright. New York[,] Charles Scribner’s Sons. $1.50.
<— Medical Century: A Journal of Homeopathic Medicine and Surgery, May 1, 1902, page 148:
NEW BOOKS.
“Aliens.”
<— New York Times, May 3, 1902, page BR11:
Mary Tappan Wright’s “Aliens.”*
“Aliens” is a novel of more than usual
excellence. It is well written, the characters
are well sustained, and the situation—it
is hardly a plot—is one that calls for
much subtlety of discernment on the part
of the author. The scene is laid in Tallawara,
a small college town of the South., in
which the problem of the races burns with
little abatement some two-score years after
the war. *ALIENS. By Mary Tappan Wright. Cloth. 8vo. Pp. vi.-424. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. 1902. Price $1.50.
<— Boston Times, May 8, 1902, page [?]: [The following is quoted in The Baltimore Sun review of May 15, 1902; the full review has not yet been located.] . . . The book goes on showing how they, our dearly beloved brethren of the South, not only chased n—rs with dogs, but burned schoolhouses, shot those who opposed them in politics and established an alien atmosphere in a country where the black people are hated and New Englanders despised. Oh, they are a lovely lot of Americans down there!
<— The Baltimore Sun, May 15, 1902, page 8:
In the Boston Times of May 8 there appeared a review of Mary Tappan Wright’s novel “Aliens.” the reviewer did not in the least concern himself with the merits of the book as a piece of literature, but merely repeated some of the statements made in the novel regarding the conditions of affairs in the South. So crudely was the work of reviewing done that the critic calls the author “Miss Wright,” and is evidently unaware that she is the wife of a professor at Harvard University. Boston must come to Baltimore, apparently, to learn the facts concerning those who live in the Modern Athens. The reviewer, as we have said, contents himself with extracting statements from the book, and, after quoting a scene concerning the “setting of dogs” upon the trail of a negro who has attempted to commit murder, concludes his review with the following words: “The book goes on showing how they, our dearly beloved brethren of the South, not only chased n—rs with dogs, but burned schoolhouses, shot those who opposed them in politics and established an alien atmosphere in a country where the black people are hated and New Englanders despised. Oh, they are a lovely lot of Americans down there!” Now, a pseudo criticism which contains such crudities of English and puerile lack of dignity of form might well be passed over in contemptuous silence but for the fact that there is a lesson to be learned even from the venomous animus of the article. This lesson lies in the danger of sectional fiction in this country. In our review of Mrs. Wright’s work—a review, by the way, which preceded by nearly a month that of the journal published in her own city—we called attention to that fact that the book was utterly false to truth, though probably written with entire sincerity. This may be a matter of dispute—among those who have never lived in the South; but that which cannot occasion dispute is the absurdity of accepting fiction as an implicit statement of fact. That to do this is folly, and childish folly, must be evident to everyone who takes the trouble to think. How indignant were we as a nation when Dickens wrote “Martin Chuzzlewit” and gave his pictures of America as his hero saw it! Yet there was here the same substratum of fact that there is in “Aliens;” only it was an incomplete and therefore a totally false view. What should we think today of an Englishman who should form his opinions of America upon the statements made in Dickens’ great novel? We know that Dickens selected merely the salient facts which suited the purpose of his book; and he was perfectly justifiable in so doing. But who but a candidate for an asylum for idiots would accept the picture which he drew as a typical one of American conditions of his day? Yet that would be no more a warranty of fitness for admission to the above-mentioned institution than the acceptance of the statements in a sectional novel written by an alien to the section delineated. The fact is that Mrs. Wright’s novel, as all of its class, is false from beginning to end. This statement does not mean that none of its facts are correct; they may be so, though we have no knowledge of such incidents having occurred. But the falsity lies in the representation of such facts as typical, when in reality they are nothing of the kind. Has our criticaster ever read the story of the Englishman who wrote that “all the women of Calais are red-haired and bad-tempered”? If not, we recommend it to his consideration. Mrs. Wright has been guilty of an old but unpardonable fault, that of generalizing from insufficient data and accepting particular incidents as general illustrations; and the reviewer has been guilty of the absurdity of accepting such statements as veritable. We who write remember, on a hurried trip to Boston; having seen at a restaurant a man who disdained the use of a fork in eating; shall we therefore write a novel in which we represent all the inhabitants of Boston as eating with their knives? And shall we find reviewers in the South who will commend the book and, upon our authority, declare that there is no refinement to be found in the modern Athens? And if not, why not? There is a yet deeper truth to be found in a consideration of Mrs. Wright’s novel and of the tirade which that novel has called forth from our criticaster. It is this: No alien to a section can write the truth about that section, however long may be his residence therein. Mrs. Wright herself recognizes this fact when she makes one of her characters say: “After all, you really know nothing of the North, and I feel that I might be here for years and years and yet know very little more about the south.” This is profoundly true, and the very fact that the truth thus came to her should have induced Mrs. Wright to burn her MS. and refrain from issuing that which she knew must of necessity be an untrue account of Southern social conditions. That she did not thus act casts a suspicion upon the fairness of her attitude; but we will let that pass. The fact is that Mrs. Wright attempted the impossible. No inhabitant of either section of our country can find the truth concerning the other. He may see, and accurately note, the facts which make up his immediate environment; but the immemorial conditions which have given existence to those facts are hidden from him, and without knowledge of those his ignorance of the essential nature of his environment must be absolute. He who should give account of the existent conditions, being himself by birth and training alien to those conditions, would be in the position of a typewriter who copied some manuscript written in an unknown language; the copy might be accurate enough, but he would have no conception of the meaning of the work and could give no rational account of its tendency. No New Englander, be he the most receptive of men, can possibly become qualified to write truly of the South, because he can see only effect, while entirely ignorant of the underlying cause. It needs the most intimate and even racial acquaintance with the precedent conditions before the existing state of things can be even vaguely understood. The most indefatigable searcher after truth, under the circumstances, could find nothing but an aggregation of phenomena, the workings of which would appear to him distorted and crude because he could not grasp the causes which had called the phenomena into existence. Nor do we desire to confine our statements to any one section of our country. It would be as impossible for a native of the South, going upon a visit—even an extended one—to New England, to understand the existent conditions in their true aspects as in the reverse case. He could not by any possibility follow the old and wise rule and “put himself in the place” of the New Englander; he could not feel or understand the force of the racial traditions which have made the Northerner that which he is. He would not, if he were a man of intelligence, be guilty, for example, of supposing that our Boston reviewer was a typical Northern critic; but he would fail even here to understand the heritage of bigotry which makes possible such a criticism as that before us. Having read “Aliens” and the succeeding review, he might not indeed write, “All Northern novelists are shadow and all Northern reviews are blatantly ignorant and childishly credulous;” but he would none the less be unable to understand the social conditions which would permit the publication of such a review in the columns of a reputable journal. This merely as example. There is another act to be considered. It is proverbially easy to see the faults of our acquaintances and even friends [but] difficult to recognize the compensating virtues. It is thus also with our national sections. When a Northerners goes South or a Southerner North, the first things that strike him—and first impressions always remain, at least in modifying influence—are those matters which are characteristic of the section and therefore antipodal to his accustomed conceptions of social polity. Even if he later learns the reasons for the existence of some of these things, he never becomes accustomed to the things themselves; they remain opposed to his racial traditions and even ideas and are to the end “tolerable and not to be endured.” And it is unfortunately the truth that it is precisely these departures from unity which are the most likely to be really reprehensible. Therefore the observer receives and retains a distorted impression of the social conditions of the foreign section; he does not note the obtaining of the virtues with which he is familiar—these being made unimpressive by their very familiarity—nor does he, as a rule, become acquainted with those virtues which are peculiarly sectional. Then he records, as is but natural, those points of departure which remain salient in his impressions, and thus gives a partial and corrupt view of the whole. Again, the alien in our midst, whether North or South, however hospitably received, is rarely welcomed among us as “our own familiar friend,” and he can see but from the outside even the little which he sees at all. Such a view can never give result of truth. For these reasons, and others which we have not space to enumerate, we deplore the existence of the sectional novel when written by an alien. We believe that we are justified in the statement that a true one has never been written; we believe that it is impossible that it should be. When a sectional novel appears, the wise man will receive its statements with great caution, though the fool in his folly may accept them as implicitly true. There have been novels of the North written by Southerners; shall we take them as our authority and, culling from their pages a record of ignorance, bigotry, hatred and all uncharitableness, exclaim in the elegant language of the review under consideration, “Oh, they are a lovely lot of Americans up there!” We should be as amply justified as our criticaster; and we should be as ignorant and foolish. Let the writer of the review in question turn to “Roughing It” and read the account of the political disputes between the old Captain and “Williams.” He will find many interesting facts of history, both North and South; and we have no doubt that he will accept them in all good faith; for are they not written in a book? Then let him write a review of the work—it is only 30 years old, which is not much for Boston, apparently—and tell us triumphantly of the statements made by “Williams” as veritable facts. Such a review would be as creditable to his intelligence and taste as the one which we have made the basis of our article.
<— New York Times, May 17, 1902, page BR12:
The New York Times Saturday Review of Books:
In “Aliens” Mrs. Mary Tappan Wright
has presented a wonderfully graphic picture
of the South as it is to-day. A picture
vivid with the descriptions of the violent
antagonisms which still sway that unhappy
region, pathetic in the portrayal of the
misery of the negroes, and full of charm in
the lovely pictures of the soft beauty of the
Southern savannahs. I was born at [sic: in] the
South in the old days “before the war,”
and my earliest memories are of the wide
cotton fields, the innumerable flowers, the
drooping sweep of the gray moss, and the
wild call of the bird notes across the river.
I have visited there frequently since those
early years, and may claim to know something
of present conditions. Most ably are
these sad, these deplorable conditions described
in this book. The community of
white people living in a region where they
are “outnumbered eight to one” by the
negroes who are still very much what they
were in slavery, with the same careless
good nature, the same indolence, and the
same impossibility of rising to any higher
scale than that of farm hands and servants.
The poverty of the whites and their kindness
to these poorer neighbors, yet the
constant dread of an outbreak of the crimes
that have made them a terror, the struggle
of some brave Northerners to keep a school
for the colored children, and the ostracism
under which they live—all these things are
described with wonderful power, while the
characters of the romance are strongly
drawn and the interest steadily maintained. LILLIE DEVEREUX BLAKE.
New York, May 15, 1902.
<— The Nation, May 22, 1902, pages 411-412:
Aliens. By Mary Tappan Wright. Charles Scribner’s Sons. ‘Aliens’ stands out prominently among novels of the South for breadth, for impartiality, for force. The region is the cotton belt; the time, contemporaneous; the motive, a showing of how little reconstruction has reconstructed, and of how worse than useless are many of the attempts to foist Northern ideas on Southerners of either color. The little colony of Northerners living in the town of Tallawara fall under the witching spell of the South, yet grow daily more and more aware of the unbridgable chasm between them. The conscientious New Englanders cannot understand why the negroes should not hold meetings; the Southerners cannot convince any outsiders that the mere word insurrection suggests to Southern ears enough to account for the ostracizing of Northern mission-school teachers. Mrs. Wright appears capable of understanding both points of view—so capable that her book makes a profound impression. As a story it is absorbing, in spite of some floating threads of diffuseness and disconnectedness. As a political document it is profoundly sad; its very freedom from exaggeration and morbidness only serving to deepen the shadow. Copies of Booker Washington’s writings ought to accompany it if it is not to make sorrowing pessimists of its readers. The story is not technically one of unmitigated gloom. There is infinite humor and variety in the types depicted; hardly one which, however familiar its genus and species, is not developed into individuality. The Southern flirt is even more originally flirtatious, unreasonable, and charming than usual. The New England women are human, though pronounced. The Southern politicians grind their axes with a difference. A few of the private problems lack decisive handling, as the relationship between Professor Thurston and his wife. A few of the characters are not needed at all. But never has the butterfly man been better delineated than in Trenholm, who—says Zoë—“is a part of our education; sooner or later every one of us falls in love with him. We’ve got to have it, like the measles or the whooping-cough. . . . I’m a scarlet-fever case myself.” In fine, ‘Aliens’ is emphatically a book to be read. It haunts the thoughts, and it leaves the reader with a patriotic but perhaps wholesome heartache.
<— The Louisville Post, June? 1902, page ?:
By Mary Tappan Wright “Belongs distinctly to the higher class of modern fiction, and will not lack for readers, though the readers’ opinions concerning it are likely to be at odds.”—Louisville Post.
[from a Scribner’s display ad in The Book Buyer, June 1902, page 414; complete review will be posted when located]
<— Overland Monthly and Out West Magazine, June 1902, pages 983-984: Two Novels of the New South.
I have for review
this month two
books by Southern
writers protesting
against the “black scourge,” which has
come upon the South as a natural consequence
of the sin of slavery. One is
written in the hot spirit of revenge, possessed
of a more than Puritan bigotry,
and cannot lay claim to any great literary
merit. “The Leopard’s spots,” by
Thomas Dixon, Jr., is apparently a novel
with a purpose, but what that purpose
is further than to increase the race
hatred already existing in the New
South, is more than I can make out. The
late Spanish war created considerable
friendly spirit between the North and
the South, but for the sake of that renewed
affection I hope that Mr. Dixon
does not represent a large class of men
in the New South—men who cannot forgive
certain events of the Civil War
which it would not be magnanimous for
the North to mention, and who, in the
chronic sting of defeat, lay all the present
woes of the South to the abolition
of slavery. The simple fact is that the
South owes all her woes not to the abolition
of slavery, but to the original introduction
of slavery. The South is to-day
like a debauchee who has injected
a poisonous narcotic into his blood. The
first effects of the drug were pleasant,
sedative, languorous, but when the false
influences have worn away beware the
gibbering fiends that haunt the sufferer! [Note: the evident truncation of the second review is as in the original.]
<— The Dial, June 1, 1902, pages 389-390:
In the general search for literary material now going
on in America, the South is by no means overlooked.
Mr. Thomas Dixon, Jr., takes the Reconstruction era
for the topic of his rather ill-natured work, “The
Leopard’s Spots” (Doubleday, Page & Co.). The
author states again and again that the bitterness against
the North is due more to the excesses of the “carpet-bag”
epoch than to the deeds of the Civil War. He
is full of hatred against the negro, who was rather the
tool in the hands of designing whites than an actor on
his own responsibility in the scenes complained of.
Yet his book will not have been written in vain if it
points out the dangers of ruling a people against its
will, the awful perils of governing without the consent
of the governed.
<— The Times, Richmond, Virginia, June 8, 1902, page 18: BOOKS AND AUTHORS, COMMENT AND GOSSIP The Aliens. By Mary Tappan Wright. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York. $1.25. The Bell Book and Stationery Co.
An ostrasuzed [sic] colony of yankee teachers
isolated at a negro school near a
town in the middle South furnishes the
storm center of "The Aleins." [sic] A beautiful
and exceedingly attractive young
recruit form [sic] Boston, daughter of the
head of the institution is the light of love
for Jim Trenholm, an insouciant descendant
of old-time neighborhood lads
of the soil, who writes strong romantic
novels and is the northern idea of the
Southern male flirst. [sic] Two other principal
characters are Professor Thurston of
the College at Tallowara, evidently a
Harvard man transplanted to the South;
and Helen Thurston, his wife a typical
Boston-bred woman of a very fine sort,
but who, of course, makes trouble from
cover to cover, all with the best intentions
in the world, from her point of
view.
<— The Ecclesiastical Review, August, 1902, page 236:
ALIENS: Mary Tappan Wright. Scribner. $1.50. The misunderstandings of the natives of a Southern college town and the Northern bride of one of the professors, and the mischief wrought by injudicious Northern teachers of negro schools are shown with impartiality yet with vividness, in a story exhibiting many strongly marked types. The woman of mixed blood appears as the South knows her, not as certain Northern writers present her for partisan purposes, and although the subject is treated with more delicacy than is bestowed upon it in anti-slavery novels, the book is not to be recommended to young girls.
<— The Era, August, 1902, pages 219-220:
Fiction . . . “Aliens,” by Mary Tappan Wright, drops a few respectable and intelligent Northern people into a Southern town, as permanent residents. They hold their better neighbors in high regard and the sentiment is reciprocated, but the longer the colonists remain, the further apart they and the Southerners drift—and all on account of the negro; the natives will not even tolerate Northern teachers for negro mission schools. “Aliens” should be twice read; first for its judicial view of Southern politics, secondly, for its fun and flirtation, to banish the attack of blues which the first reading will compel. (Scribner’s.)
<— Literary Boston of To-Day, by Helen M. Winslow, August, 1902, pages 220-221: Mary Tappan Wright is another familiar name to magazine readers. Mrs. Wright lives in Cambridge, on beautiful old Quincy Street, the wife of J. H. Wright, himself an author-editor as well as professor of Greek at Harvard University. She was the daughter of President Tappan of Kenyon College. Her books are “A Truce and Other Stories” and “The Alien,” [sic] a recent successful novel, treating of Southern life from the Northern point of view.
<— New Age, August 2, 1902, page 7:
The period of recent Southern history between the years of reconstruction and the present new South has heretofore escaped the novelist. This is the period in which Mrs. Mary Tappan Wright has placed her novel, “Aliens,” Scribners publishers. Mrs. Wright is the wife of Prof. John Henry Wright, professor of Greek in Harvard.
<— The Saturday Review of Politics, Literature, Science and Art, August 30, 1902, page 274:
. . . In “The Aliens” Mrs. Mary Tappan Wright has made a close study of much later conditions in a Southern community. She describes with great distinctness, but without any surplusage of detail, an old college town, the peculiarities and characteristics of which are brought out by the introduction of a professor from a New England college and his cultivated wife. The novel is entirely free from the didactic element and is conspicuously fair ; it is to be commended as a study of the race problem as it presents itself in the daily life of a small Southern town. It is a book which may be read with profit by Northern as well as by English readers.
<— The Bookseller, September 1902, page 325:
MARY TAPPAN WRIGHT
Mary Tappan Wright, whose very
strong novel of Southern life, Aliens, is
soon to be published by the Scribners, is
the wife of Professor John H. Wright,
of Harvard University, the Dean of the
Graduate Department and Professor of
Greek. She and her husband are well
known in the society of Cambridge,
where they have lived for years. Mrs.
Wright comes of the well-known Tappan
family of Ohio, her father having
been president of Kenyon College. She
was born in Steubenville. —
<— Outlook, September 6, 1902, page 13:
The Outlook has noted from time to
time of late years the increasing number
of books interpretive of Southern life,
explaining the Southern point of view,
making the Southern attitude towards certain
grave questions comprehensible by
the Northern reader. Not long ago, Miss
Ellen Glasgow’s “The Battle-Ground”
was commented upon as an admirable
interpretation of the older and later Virginia
life, at once vivid, sympathetic, and
dispassionate. Miss Glasgow writes as
a Virginian who knows at first hand and
almost by instinct the material with which
she is dealing. Mrs. Mary Tappan
Wright’s “The Aliens,” [sic] which came not
Long ago from the press of Messrs. Charles
Scribner’s Sons, has great value as a
revelation of the social ideas, the charm
of manner, and the peculiar bent of
thought on certain questions disclosed in
an old Southern community.
<— The Critic, October 1902, page 376:
Wright—Aliens. By Mary Tappan Wright.
<— The Publishers’ Weekly, Jan. 31, 1903, page 142:
. . . Mary Tappan Wright is the author of “Aliens,” which breaks almost unworked ground in its pictures of present social and political conditions at the South. . . .
<— European Years: The Letters of an Idle Man, [by Hermann Jackson Warner], edited by George Edward Woodberry, October 1911, pages 340, 342-343: [Note: this entry is not really a review, but an extract from a private letter later published together with other letters of the author’s. It is reproduced here as an instance of the reaction of a reader rather than that of a critic.]
ON THE ITALIAN RIVIERA, 2 MARCH, 1903.
Dear M.,—
. . . Well, at this present, the wife is reading aloud an American novel, written by a woman, one Mary Tappan Wright, entitled Aliens. It is all about life in the South; and the Aliens are folk that have gone down there on a “Fool’s Errand,” hoping to lift up the down-trodden n—r and make him a tidy member of the community. It is a picture, in fact, of the antagonisms which are all the time going on in the South, and as such it may interest you: for I do not believe that it is overdrawn, though sometimes blurred, like all Impressionist pictures. . . .
<— Hartford Courant, April 30, 1904, page 18: [From a review of The Test:] In “The Aliens” [sic] she treated the question of the practically irreconcileable [sic] differences between the North and South in an impartial and penetrating spirit making a story full of suggestiveness and conviction.
<— The London Quarterly Review, April, 1909, page 278:
. . . The striking novel, Aliens, by Mrs. Mary Tappan Wright, daughter of a university president and wife of a university professor, shows how a university not under public control may yet suffer a considerable impairment of its independence through the necessity, for financial reasons, of keeping on good terms with the dominant party in the State. . . . HERBERT W. HORWILL.
These reviews were originally published in the journals and books credited.
The works here reproduced are in the public domain. All other material in this edition is
©2008-2018 by Brian Kunde.
|
1st web edition posted
3/17/2008.
This page last updated
1/16/2018.
Published by Fleabonnet Press.