Martin Schneider
Stanford
University
Department
of Economics
579
Jane Stanford Way
Stanford,
CA 94305-6072
(650)
721 6320
Recent Papers
Household climate
finance: theory and survey data on safe and risky green assets (with
Aron-Dine, Beutel and Piazzesi)
Uncertainty
of frictions? A quantitative model of scarce safe assets (with Ilut and Krivenko)
How
unconventional is green monetary policy? (with Papoutsi and Piazzesi)
Modeling
uncertainty as ambiguity: a review, with Ilut,
prepared for the Handbook
of Economic Expectations
Uncertainty and
change: survey evidence of firms' subjective beliefs (with Bachmann,
Carstensen, Lautenbacher and Menkhoff), R&R American
Economic Review
Learning about housing
cost: survey evidence from the German house price boom (with Kindermann,
LeBlanc and Piazzesi)
Uncertainty is
more than risk: survey evidence on Knightian and Bayesian firms (with
Bachmann, Carstensen and Lautenbacher)
Credit
lines, bank deposits or CBDC? Competition and efficiency in modern payment
systems (with Piazzesi)
Inflation and the
price of real assets (with Leombroni, Piazzesi and Rogers), R&R Review of Economic Studies
Moving to fluidity:
regional growth and labor market churn (with Hoffmann and Piazzesi)
Money and Banking in a New
Keynesian Model (with Piazzesi and Rogers)
Payments, Credit and
Asset Prices (with Piazzesi)
Banks’ Risk Exposures (with Begenau and Piazzesi)
R&R Econometrica
Trend and Cycle in Bond
Premia (with Piazzesi and
Salomao)
Research
by topic
Ambiguity in macro & finance
Credit & money
Interest rate & credit risk
Housing
Learning in markets
Ambiguity
in macro & finance
Recursive
multiple priors, with Larry
Epstein
Journal of Economic Theory, 113(1), 32-50 (2003)
Axiomatizes dynamically consistent model of intertemporal decision making under
ambiguity. Shows how to update sets of priors.
Learning
under ambiguity, with Larry Epstein
Review of Economic Studies, 74((4), 1275-1303 (2007)
Tractable model of learning under ambiguity from iid
signals. Shows that ambiguity may but need not vanish in long run. Quantitative
application to portfolio choice with learning about mean returns
illustrates slow convergence & 1st order effects of parameter
uncertainty.
Ambiguity,
information quality and asset pricing, with Larry Epstein
Journal of Finance, 63(1), 197-228 (2008)
Learning from signals with ambiguous precision induces asymmetric response to
news: good news discounted, bad news taken seriously. Asset pricing model
delivers negative skewness and premia for low (idiosyncractic)
information quality. Quantitative application to pricing after 9/11.
Ambiguity and
asset markets, with Larry Epstein
Annual Reviews of Financial Economics 2, 315-34 (2010)
Surveys models of ambiguity aversion and their applications in finance
Ambiguous
Business Cycles, with Cosmin
Ilut,
American Economic Review 104: 2368-2399 (2014)
Proposes a class of business cycle models with uncertainty shocks
that can be analyzed by standard linear methods. In estimated
medium scale New Keynesian model, ambiguity shocks play
important role by generating comovement of
major aggregates
Uncertainty
shocks, asset supply and pricing over the business cycle with Francesco Bianchi & Cosmin Ilut,
Review of Economic Studies 85 (2), pp. 810–854, (2018)
Business
cycle model with corporate sector payout and capital structure choice. Firms
react to time variation in (measured) risk premia. Risk premia are driven
by ambiguity. Stochastic volatility affects perceived ambiguity
and thereby has 1st order effects.
Slow to hire, quick to
fire: employment dynamics with asymmetric responses to news, with Cosmin Ilut
& Matthias Kehrig,
Journal of Political Economy, 126(5), pages 2011-2071, (2018)
Cross sectional dispersion of employment growth ("micro
volatility") and conditional volatility of aggregate employment growth
("macro volatility") are countercyclical because firms respond more
strongly to bad news than to good news. Micro data on manufacturing
establishments further show negative skewness in time series and cross section,
and asymmetric response to TFP shocks, both consistent with the mechanism.
Credit & money
Balance
Sheet Effects, Bailout Guarantees, and Financial Crises, with Aaron Tornell
Review of Economic Studies 2004, 71(3), 883-913
If borrowers cannot commit to repay, systemic bailout guarantees not only
encourage (coordinated) risk taking but also alleviate underinvestment.
Explains why emerging market lending booms see strong nontradable
sector growth financed by foreign currency debt and eventually become
vulnerable to self-fulfilling "twin crises" (widespread defaults
& real devaluation).
Aggregate
implications of wealth redistribution: the case of inflation, with Matthias Doepke
Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(2-3), 493-502 (2006)
OLG model where zero sum redistribution shock has persistent aggregate effects.
Motivated by inflation episode, shock takes from old retired
agents with high propensity to consume out of wealth and gives to young workers
with low propensity to consume. Asymmetric responses decrease aggregate labor
supply and increase aggregate savings, and are
propagated slowly through changes in wealth distribution.
Inflation
and the Redistribution of Nominal Wealth, with Matthias Doepke
Journal of Political Economy, 114(6), 1069-97 (2006)
Measures the size and duration of nominal positions for broad sectors of the US
economy as well as households by age and wealth. Shows that an inflation
episode entails sizeable redistribution from rich, old households and
foreigners towards young middle class households and
the government sector. A more gradual episode strengthens the effect as it
protects short term nominal assets of the middle class.
Inflation
as a redistribution shocks: effects on aggregates and welfare, with Matthias Doepke
Quantifies the aggregate and welfare effects of an inflation episode in the US
economy. Inflation would benefit a broad coalition of households provided that gains from the revaluation of government debt
are used to increase retirement benefits of the less well-off.
Money
as a unit of account, with Matthias Doepke
Econometrica 85 (5), pp. 1537-1574 (2017)
Derives conditions for dominant unit of account in optimal system
of contracts. Assumes cost of writing contingent contracts and gains of trade
along credit chains formed by random matching. Common unit of account helps
avoid costly mismatch of income and expenditure along chains and allows
formation of longer chains.
Payments,
credit and asset prices, with Monika
Piazzesi; Simple monetary economy in which
payments occur in two layers: endusers (households
and institutional investors) use inside money to pay for goods and securities,
whereas banks provide inside money and use outside money (reserves) to handle
payment instructions. Works out the determination of asset prices &
inflation to show how shocks to security payoffs affect inflation and monetary
policy affects asset prices. Monetary policy can no longer be summarized by the
nominal interest rate alone, as it affects both the return on money and the mix
of securities available to banks to back inside money.
The Short Rate
Disconnect in a Monetary Economy with Monika Piazzesi and Moritz Lenel
Forthcoming Journal of Monetary Economics
Housing
Housing, consumption and asset pricing, with Monika Piazzesi
and Selale
Tuzel
Journal of Financial Economics 83, 531-569 (2007)
Representative agent model with two trees (housing, equity) and nonseparable utility over fruit (housing services,
other consumption). Composition risk of consumption basket is priced and
changes over time. Share of housing in total consumption predicts excess
returns on equity.
Inflation illusion, credit and asset prices,
with Monika Piazzesi
in Asset Pricing and Monetary Policy, J.Y. Campbell (ed.), Chicago IL,
Chicago University Press, pp. 147-181 (2007)
Whenever borrowers and lenders disagree about real interest rates,
there are gains from trade, so credit and collateral values increase. Money
illusion leads to more disagreement when nominal rates are unusually
high or low, predicting housing booms in 1970s as well as 2000s.
Momentum
traders in the housing market: survey evidence and a search model
with Monika Piazzesi
American Economic Review P&P 99(2) 493-502 (2009)
Cluster analysis of Michigan survey expectations shows increase of small
(20% max) cluster with extrapolative expectations in
2006-7. In search model of housing market calibrated to low
turnover and large transaction costs, small inflow of exuberant traders is
enough to move prices
The Housing
Market(s) of San Diego, with Tim
Landvoigt and Monika Piazzesi,
American
Economic Review 105(4): 1371-1407
Quantitative study of assignment model for San Diego County housing market boom
2000-5. Capital gains much higher for low
quality housing. Cheap credit is key; composition of housing supply also
matters.
Housing
assignment with restrictions: theory and evidence from Stanford campus
(with Tim Landvoigt and Martin Schneider)
American Economic Review P&P 2014, pp. 67-72.
Pricing of indivisible houses when a subset of eligible investors has exclusive
access to houses in a restricted area. House prices reflect the relative shapes
of the distributions of quality (restricted vs other) and buyer characteristics
(eligible vs other)
Inflation and the
Price of Real Assets, with Monika
Piazzesi
Overlapping generations model with unsinsurable
nominal risk and household choice of equity, housing & bonds.
Changes in demographics and inflation expectations can explain large share
of movements in household net worth and negative comovement
of equity & house price in postwar US
Housing
and Macroeconomics, with Monika Piazzesi
Our
chapter for the new Handbook of Macroeconomics
edited by John Taylor and Harald Uhlig, July 2016
Segmented Housing
Search (with Monika Piazzesi
and Johannes
Stroebel, forthcoming in the AER)
Divides SF Bay Area into housing market segments, starting from new data set on
buyers' internet searches. Documents substantial heterogeneity in market
activity and searcher clienteles across segments. Search model with mutliple segments infers role of
moving shocks and buyer preferences.
Learning in markets
Strategic
Experimentation and Disruptive Technological Change
Review
of Economic Dynamics
2008, 11(2) 386-412.
Dynamic investment game with learning between incumbent and startup who
operates new technology of unknown potential. Changes in market power often preceded by subpar early performance of new
technology: incumbent then does not switch technologies and later gambles for
resurrection by sticking with old technology.
International
Equity Flows and Returns: A Quantitative Equilibrium Approach, with Rui Albuquerque and Greg Bauer
Review
of Economic Studies
2007, 74/1: 1-30.
Quantitative model of equity trading with heterogeneous investors and private
information applied to G7 equity markets. Accounts for
volume, gross and net trades between US investors and locals as well as
the correlation of US investors' trades and returns. Within country investor heterogenity is much more important than cross country
heterogeneity.
Global Private
Information in International Equity Markets, with Rui Albuquerque and Greg Bauer
Journal
of Financial Economics 2009, 94 (1),
18-46.
Documents "global return chasing": US investors' net equity purchases
comove with returns on many countries simultaneously. Model of trading on
"global" private information jointly accounts for global return
chasing, equity home bias and the mixed performance of foreign investors in
local markets.
Learning
from prices implies makes investors with higher initial exposure to a risk
factor more optimistic about that risk factor. Increase in exposure by an
unknown fraction of market participants does not lead to sharing of exposure,
but instead to less trade, lower prices and higher risk premia.