Note
that whereas some of these developmental processes, such as P2>EMS signaling
are somewhat different from the more familiar Wnt signaling events, other Wnt
signaling pathways in C. elegans, such as the postembryonic
Q migration are “canonical” in the sense that they use the same
components as vertebrate/Drosophila pathways.
Protein/gene |
|
P2-> EMSE fate |
P2->EMS spindle rot. |
VPC fate |
Q progeny migration. |
P12 fate |
T cell polarity |
P7.p polarity |
V cells |
gonad
migration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Porcupine |
|
5, 6 |
20 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wnt |
|
5, 6 |
|
|
9 |
1 |
24, 25 |
|
23 |
|
Frizzled |
|
5, 6 |
20 |
|
MIG-1 9, 27 |
1 |
14, 15 |
14, 15 |
23 |
|
Disheveled |
|
|
|
26 |
26 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
GSK3 |
|
20 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Axin** |
|
|
|
3 |
PRY-1 8 |
PRY-1 3 |
|
|
PRY-1 8, 23 |
|
APC |
|
5 |
|
11 |
|
|
no? 31 |
|
|
|
b-catenin |
|
5 |
|
4 |
8 |
2 |
no 28 |
|
23 |
3 |
TCF |
|
7 |
|
|
28, 29 |
|
28 |
|
|
3 |
target gene |
|
|
|
4 |
10 |
1 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIT-1
(NLK) |
|
yes 12, 13, 16 |
|
no 3 |
|
|
yes 13 |
|
|
|
MOM-4
(TAK) |
|
yes 6, 16, 17 |
|
|
|
|
no 31 |
|
|
|
MIG-14 (?) (pka MOM-3) |
|
yes 6 |
yes 20 |
yes 2 |
yes 9 |
yes 2 |
no 30, 31 |
yes 21 |
|
yes 2, 19 |
|------ embryonic
----------||------------------------ postembryonic
------------------------------------------------------|
** pry-1 encodes an Axin homolog
1
Jiang
and Sternberg 1998. Development 125: 2337-2347
2
Eisenmann
and Kim 2000. Genetics 156: 1097-1116
4
Eisenmann
et al. 1998. Development 125: 3667-3680
5
Rocheleau
et al. 1997. Cell 90: 707-716
6
Thorpe
et al 1997. Cell 90: 695-705
8
Maloof
et al. 1999. Development 126:
37-49
9
Harris
et al. 1996. Development 122: 3117-3131
10
Salser
and Kenyon 1992. Nature 377:
229-232
11
Hoier
et al. 2000. Genes and Development
14: 874-886.
12
Kaletta
et al. 1997. Nature 390: 294-298
13
Rocheleau
et al. 1999. Cell 97: 717-726
14
Sternberg
and Horvitz 1988. Developmental
Biol. 130: 67-73
15
Sawa
et al. 1996. Genes and Development
10: 2189-2197
16
Meneghini
et al. 1999. Nature 399: 793-797
17
Shin
et al. 1999. Molecular Cell 4:
275-280
18
Herman
et al. 1999. Development 126: 1055-1064
19
Nishiwaki
1999. Genetics 152: 985-997
20
Schlesinger
et al. 1999. Gene and Development
13: 2028-2038
21
A. Schkesinger
and B. Bowerman personal communication
22
H. Korswagen,
personal communication
23
Hunter
et al. 1999. Development 126: 805-814
24
Herman
and Horvitz 1994. Development 120: 1035-1047
25
Herman
et al. 1995. Cell 83: 101-110
26
C. Guo PhD
thesis 1995. Johns Hopkins University
27
S. Clark,
personal communication
28
Herman
2001. Development 128: 581-590
29
Korswagen
et al. 2000. Nature 406: 527-532