Followup on Oceanside: Communications with Ron Unz

by Kenji Hakuta

Sept. 1, 2001

A few days after I posted my quick commentary on Oceanside's SAT-9 scores on August 18, I received communications from Ron Unz both on voice mail and e-mail responding to my comments about his silence. He asserted that Oceanside had redesignated "something like 20% of all their most successful LEPs. Surely you must realize that removing the most successful 20% of the students in any group would tend to depress the average test scores of the remaining 80%." He also asked to have lunch at the Stanford Faculty Club, which I obliged (and even paid for) on August 29. He then hurriedly posted an e-mail to his distribution list that included an opportunitistic reference to our lunch in which he states: "The extraordinary hunger of these bilingual activists for even the smallest shred of hope is shown by the recent reaction to a short note which Prof. Hakuta added to his personal web page while on vacation in Hawaii: without closely checking the facts, he mistakenly suggested that pro-"English" Oceanside had performed poorly on this year's test scores.  Within just 48 hours, that casual and mistaken internet posting was being distributed by bilingual activists throughout Arizona and the rest of America as formal research conclusively "proving" the failure of Proposition 227, a development that astonished and horrified the good professor when we recently had lunch at the Stanford Faculty Club." Click here for the full e-mail he circulated on Aug. 31.

Here are some observations about that lunch, etc. from my perspective:

Return to SAT-9 analysis page