"Cooperative"
or "communal" breeding occurs when more than two birds of
the same species provide care in rearing the young from one
nest. About 3 percent (approximately 300 species) of bird
species worldwide are cooperative breeders. There are two
types of cooperative arrangements: those in which mature
nonbreeders ("helpers-at-the-nest" or "auxiliaries") help
protect and rear the young, but are not parents of any of
them, and those where there is some degree of shared
parentage of offspring. Cooperative breeders may exhibit
shared maternity, shared paternity, or both. The best-studied North
American cooperative breeders, the Scrub-Jay, Gray-breasted
(Mexican) Jay, Groove-billed Ani, and Acorn Woodpecker,
differ from each other in the details of their breeding
biology. Scrub jays in Florida represent a group of
populations that probably were once in contact with the
widespread western populations but are now totally isolated.
Only in Florida are Scrub jays cooperative breeders, and
there they reside in permanent, group-defended territories.
Ornithologists Glen Woolfenden and John Fitzpatrick have
found that groups consist of a permanently bonded monogamous
pair and one to six helpers, generally the pair's offspring
of previous seasons. About half the territories are occupied
by pairs without helpers, and most other pairs have only one
or two helpers. Although pairing and breeding can occur
after one year spent as a helper, birds often spend several
years as nonbreeding auxiliaries. Males may remain in this
subsidiary role for up to six years; females generally
disperse and pair after one or two years of helping. Helpers
participate in all nonsexual activities except nest
construction, egg laying, and incubation. Pairs with helpers
are more successful -- they fledge one and a half times more
young than pairs without helpers. Florida Scrub-Jays are
largely restricted to the scattered and now much reduced oak
scrub habitat; reproductive success outside of oak scrub is
very poor. All available habitat is occupied, and
populations appear to be stable from year to year, which
means young birds are unlikely to find vacant space to set
up territories of their own. In contrast, Western Scrub-Jays
generally are not space-limited, and the probability of a
young bird leaving home and finding a territory in which to
breed is high. Like the Florida Scrub-Jay,
the closely related Gray-breasted Jay of the southwestern
U.S. lives in permanent group-defended territories, and
breeding adults are monogamous. Studies by ethologist Jerram
Brown and his colleagues have shown that the cooperative
system of this species is more complex than that of its
southeastern relatives in several ways. Gray-breasted Jay
groups are much larger, ranging from 8 to 18 individuals;
thus, they usually include offspring from more than just the
preceding year. Within each group, two and sometimes three
breeding pairs nest separately but simultaneously each
season, and some interference among them often occurs.
Interference usually involves the theft of nest-lining
materials, but can include the tossing of eggs from nests by
females of rival nests. Although the laying female does all
the incubating, she is fed on the nest both by her mate and
by auxiliaries. Nestlings receive more than half of their
feedings from auxiliaries. Although the Groove-billed
Ani breeds in southern Texas, our knowledge of its breeding
biology comes from the work of sociobiologist Sandra
Vehrencamp and her colleagues who studied the species in
Costa Rica. The groups defending permanent territories
consist of one to four monogamous breeding pairs that
occasionally include an unpaired helper. All members of the
group participate in building a single nest into which all
females lay their eggs. Incubation and care of the young are
shared by all members of the group. Beyond a certain clutch
size, some eggs tend to be buried and fail to receive proper
incubation, leading to a decreased probability of any given
egg hatching. Unlike the "cooperative"
breeders that they appear to be, female anis engage in
behaviors that increase the probability of their own eggs
being the successful ones in the communal clutch. The most
effective of these behaviors is the tossing of other
females' eggs from the nest. In spite of the increased
competition and conflict, multipair groups manage to fledge
more young per individual than do single pairs in similar
habitats. Long-term studies of Acorn
Woodpeckers have been conducted by a succession of
ornithologists, including M. H. and B. R. MacRoberts, Walter
Koenig, Ron Mumme, and Frank Pitelka at the University of
California's Hastings Natural History Reservation in central
coastal California. There Acorn Woodpecker groups are
composed of up to 15 members whose territories are based on
the defense and maintenance of granaries in which they store
acorns. Groups consist largely of siblings, their cousins,
and their parents. Some of the sexually mature birds are
nonbreeding helpers. Within each group, up to four males may
mate with one (or occasionally two) females, and all eggs
are laid in a single nest. Thus paternity and sometimes
maternity of the communal clutch is shared. Per capita reproductive
success generally increases with group size up to 7 or 8
members, and then declines. Clutches produced by two females
are somewhat less successful than those of single females
due to behavioral interference between the two females and
some egg tossing. Although there is some geographic
variation in the size of groups and other aspects of the
Acorn Woodpecker system, it breeds cooperatively throughout
its range. Why has evolution produced
cooperative breeding systems? Initial hypotheses were based
on kin selection (seemingly "selfless" behavior like helping
at the nest being favored because it increases the
reproductive success of relatives genetically similar to the
helper) or on maximizing of reproductive output. As more
cooperatively breeding species have been examined worldwide,
these explanations generally have not been supported.
Instead, cooperative systems appear to arise when
environmental constraints force birds into breeding groups
because the opportunities for younger birds to breed
independently are severely limited. Limitations may include
a shortage of territory openings because higher quality
habitats are saturated with established breeders; a shortage
of sexual partners (generally females), indicated by the
skewed sex ratios that are common in groups; and
unpredictable availability of resources, which could make it
too risky for individual pairs to commit themselves to
reproduce in any given year. That cooperative breeding is a
common strategy in arid and semiarid portions of Africa and
Australia lends strong support to this line of reasoning.
Cooperative breeding may be viewed primarily as a means by
which young adults put off the start of their own breeding
in order to maximize their lifetime reproductive output, and
in the process occasionally promote genes identical with
their own via kin selection. SEE: Natural
Selection;
Population
Dynamics. Copyright
® 1988 by Paul R. Ehrlich, David S. Dobkin, and Darryl
Wheye.