|
NCPI's Student Learning and Assessment project examines assessment mechanisms
that enhance student learning at three levels. One part of the project
focuses on state policies and regional accreditation practices. Another
examines the organizational and administrative support for student assessment
at the institutional level, and the third focuses on academic programs
and student learning. The result of five years of research, the institutional
assessment project examined the way in which college and university organizational
and administrative patterns support and promote the use of student assessment
for academic improvement.
The study consisted of three phases:
- Phase I examined what was already known about how institutions
engaged in, supported, and used student assessment. It consisted of
an extensive review of the student assessment literature and a report
entitled, Improving
the Organizational and Administrative Support for Student Assessment
(1997). From this review, seven domains of organizational activity
emerged and were used to create a Conceptual
Framework, which served as the basis for the second and third phases
of the study.
- Phase II developed a survey instrument, Inventory
of Institutional Support for Student Assessment (ISSA, 1999), and
conducted a national survey of institution's involvement with, their
organizational and administrative support for, and their uses of student
assessment. The survey was sent to all two-year and four-year institutions
(excluding proprietary schools) offering undergraduate education. Of
the 2,524 surveys sent, 1,394 institutions responded for a 55 percent
response rate. Detailed results from the national survey were compiled
in a report, Institutional
Support for Student Assessment: Methodology and Results of a National
Survey (Technical Report, 1999) and the associated
tables. After analyzing the response patterns, a number of institutions
were identified as having been actively engaged in measuring, promoting,
supporting, and using student assessment. These institutions were contacted
and asked to take part in the third phase of our study.
- Phase III analyzed the organizational dynamics that were present in
these institutions. It involved comparative case studies of seven institutions
identified in Phase II. Researchers collected documents, conducted interviews,
and gathered other relevant information about the institutions' approach
to, support for, management policies and practices for, and uses of
student assessment. Additionally, researchers identified all administrators
involved in student assessment and randomly selected 200 tenure-track
faculty and sent them a survey instrument, Institutional
Climate for Student Assessment (ICSA, 2000). This instrument was
parallel in structure to the ISSA inventory instrument but measures
institutional participant's views of involvement and satisfaction with
student assessment on their campus. Case studies for each institution
were prepared including a summary of their institutional climate survey
results. A cross case comparison was also conducted to identify useful
strategies for student assessment. For more detail on the case studies
in Phase III, see Student
Assessment in Higher Education: A Comparative Study of Seven Institutions
(2001).
|
|