SFOtoHKGin5min

From FarmShare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 17: Line 17:
== Methodology  ==
== Methodology  ==
-
=== Assessing Network Overhead (was Assessing Cardinality)  ===
+
=== Assessing Communication Overhead (was Assessing Cardinality)  ===
For embarassingly parallel problems, we considered the cardinality of the problem in order to chop the problem up into pieces which can be run on a cluster of finite size. When MPI is used, one needs to consider the constraints of the communication between the nodes participating in the job.  
For embarassingly parallel problems, we considered the cardinality of the problem in order to chop the problem up into pieces which can be run on a cluster of finite size. When MPI is used, one needs to consider the constraints of the communication between the nodes participating in the job.  
Line 25: Line 25:
There is no particular requirement in the MPI library to use more than one core. So let us get a baseline time to render measurement by running Tachyon on a single core.  
There is no particular requirement in the MPI library to use more than one core. So let us get a baseline time to render measurement by running Tachyon on a single core.  
<pre>$ qsub tachyon.submit
<pre>$ qsub tachyon.submit
 +
</pre>
 +
 +
<pre>
 +
1 core:
 +
CPU Information:
 +
  Node    0:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed  1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
 +
  Total CPUs: 1
 +
  Total Speed: 1.000000
 +
.
 +
.
 +
.
 +
 +
 +
Preprocessing Time:    1.0531 seconds
 +
Rendering Progress:      100% complete           
 +
  Ray Tracing Time:  533.7124 seconds
 +
    Image I/O Time:    0.0754 seconds
 +
 +
 +
</pre>
 +
 +
 +
'''Scaling the job up'''
 +
 +
 +
<pre>
 +
CPU Information:
 +
  Node    0:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed  1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
 +
  Node    1:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed  1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
 +
  Node    2:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed  1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
 +
  Node    3:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed  1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
 +
  Node    4:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed  1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
 +
  Node    5:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed  1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
 +
  Node    6:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed  1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
 +
  Node    7:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed  1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
 +
  Node    8:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed  1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
 +
  Node    9:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed  1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
 +
  Node  10:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed  1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
 +
.
 +
.
 +
.
 +
  Total CPUs: 208
 +
  Total Speed: 208.000000
 +
 +
Preprocessing Time:    1.5401 seconds
 +
Rendering Progress:      100% complete           
 +
  Ray Tracing Time:    3.4819 seconds
 +
    Image I/O Time:    0.0680 seconds
</pre>
</pre>

Revision as of 15:56, 8 January 2012

Contents

San Francisco to Hong Kong in 5 minutes

Introduction

This is a followon article to CheapFlights, and while the metaphor may be showing stress cracks, please bear with me. In the previous article we made the most of a single threaded, and hence single core program, by taking advantage of the embarrassingly parallel nature of moving the camera. The time taken to render any given frame, however, was completely unchanged from running povray directly on a corn. To break the 15 minutes barrier (for this particular scene file) we need to employee an HPC specific technology - MPI.

MPI stands for Message Passing Interface and is typically used as a library to a compiled language (C/C++/Fortran) or an interpreted (byte compiled actually) language such as Python. In this example we will explore a parallel raytracer called Tachyon which uses MPI as one of the available parallel options. MPI allows Tachyon access to the distributed compute and memory of all cores participating in the job. It is up to the code in Tachyon, then, to decide how to break up the task of rendering a frame such that all of the cores in the job can execute their portion and communicate their results back. This architectural decision has been made in the code of Tachyon, and we are free to run jobs on the barley cluster using as few or many cores as long as the number fits within those constraints. This number we choose becomes the size of our Tachyon job we submit to the scheduler.

Let's explore what kind of speedup Tachyon can achieve on the barley cluster. This cluster is 10 gigabit ethernet connected, which plays an important part, as all of the intermediate processing steps are communicated within all nodes participating in the job.


Executive Summary

We explore the possibilites presented with a parallel raytracer (Tachyon) using OpenMPI (an MPI library). Given a sample scene file, a singe core job takes 8.8 minutes to render a single frame. Rendering the same scene file using 208 cores on the barley cluster, as an MPI job, takes 3.4 seconds. This is a speedup of 156 times - the same as reducing the flight time from San Francisco to Hong Kong from 13hours to 5 minutes.

Methodology

Assessing Communication Overhead (was Assessing Cardinality)

For embarassingly parallel problems, we considered the cardinality of the problem in order to chop the problem up into pieces which can be run on a cluster of finite size. When MPI is used, one needs to consider the constraints of the communication between the nodes participating in the job.

Running on a Single core

There is no particular requirement in the MPI library to use more than one core. So let us get a baseline time to render measurement by running Tachyon on a single core.

$ qsub tachyon.submit
1 core:
CPU Information:
  Node    0:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed   1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
  Total CPUs: 1
  Total Speed: 1.000000
.
.
.


Preprocessing Time:     1.0531 seconds
Rendering Progress:       100% complete            
  Ray Tracing Time:   533.7124 seconds
    Image I/O Time:     0.0754 seconds



Scaling the job up


CPU Information:
  Node    0:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed   1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
  Node    1:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed   1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
  Node    2:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed   1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
  Node    3:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed   1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
  Node    4:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed   1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
  Node    5:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed   1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
  Node    6:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed   1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
  Node    7:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed   1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
  Node    8:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed   1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
  Node    9:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed   1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
  Node   10:  1 CPUs, CPU Speed 1.00, Node Speed   1.00 Name: barley01.stanford.edu
.
.
.
  Total CPUs: 208
  Total Speed: 208.000000

Preprocessing Time:     1.5401 seconds
Rendering Progress:       100% complete            
  Ray Tracing Time:     3.4819 seconds
    Image I/O Time:     0.0680 seconds
Personal tools
Toolbox
LANGUAGES