Criterion |
D- |
D |
D+/C- |
C |
C+/B- |
B |
B+/A- |
A |
A+ |
Raw |
Weight |
Final |
|||
Stylistic: Degree of
Completion, Clarity, Accuracy |
Incomplete, formless,
simplistic |
It exists in some
organized fashion with some attention to detail |
An organized,
well-developed form, presented with attention to detail |
Flawless or
almost flawless with great attention to detail. |
|
1 |
|
||||||||
Sources: Adequate
citation Permissions |
Little or
inaccurate and misleading citation/permissions |
Insufficient
citations or permissions |
Appropriate
citations and permissions for all copyrighted materials |
Appropriate
citations and permissions. Use
of high quality or highly appropriate sources. |
|
1 |
|
||||||||
Relevance to
Course Content |
Presentation has
little substantive commentary on course themes or aims |
Presentation
resubmits basic course ideas and goes no further. |
Presentation
works with subtle course ideas to good effect and applies the ideas well |
Presentation
offers substantial expansion of course ideas in new and relevant
directions. The new thought is
subtle. |
|
2 |
|
||||||||
Form/Content |
Form obscures
meaning completely |
Form obscures
analytical content but there is some perceptible relevance and meaning |
Form is a good
vehicle for the topic and conveys the analytical content |
Form is an
excellent choice for the argument and very successfully conveys that argument |
|
2 |
|
||||||||
Degree and Quality of Of Analysis, |
No analysis
apparent or intended. Pure summary or no cogent content |
Descriptive or
summative thesis. Too
general. No obvious thesis or
argument |
Specific
analytical thesis and argument.
Accurate and/or well-supported. |
Outstanding,
subtle thesis and nuanced argument.
Accurate and well-supported |
|
3 |
|
||||||||
Originality |
Obviously derived
from little or hurried thought |
Some attempt to
present material in an interesting way but still pedestrian |
Obvious
translation of ideas into interesting and creative forms |
Novel insights
evidenced by form and content |
|
3 |
|
||||||||
Technical Prowess or Skill |
No obvious
thought given to best use of media for targeted audience, etc. |
Little or
inadequate attention to two or more of the criteria under A and B |
Relevant, some
attention to pacing, audience, integration of media, coherent, and
interesting |
Highly relevant,
well-paced, apt targeting to audience, relationship to other media, coherent,
visually interesting |
|
1 |
|
||||||||