Design, Technology , and Engineering benefitting individuals
with disabilities and older adults in the local community |
July 27, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
Perspectives is the newsletter of the
Stanford course, Perspectives in Assistive Technology.
Summer Update
This issue
describes course planning for the next academic
year.
Perspectives in Assistive
Technology is a Winter Quarter Stanford course - entering its
fifteenth year - that explores the design, development, and use of
assistive technology that benefits people with disabilities and older adults.
It consists of semi-weekly online discussions; lectures by
notable professionals, clinicians, and assistive technology users; virtual
tours of local medical, clinical, and engineering facilities; student
project presentations and demonstrations; a Virtual Assistive Technology
Faire; and a film screening. |
Summer
Update
|
Summer Update |
Greetings members of the Stanford's Assistive Technology
course community,
I hope you are doing well - staying healthy and safe -
during this very crazy time. Over the past several months, I have been
scrambling to finish my Winter Quarter Assistive Technology course, including
organizing alternate project presentations, reading final reports, and
submitting grades. I have struggled to keep up with my physical exercise,
emails, meetings, and interactions at home with my laptop. In short, my entire
normal routine has been disrupted and I have seen few friends and colleagues in
person. Perhaps you also share some of these experiences. Here is a belated
report on what has happened since the beginning of March and my thoughts for
the future.
The date was Friday, March 6th, the end of Week 9 of the
Winter Quarter. While listening to the evening news, I was surprised to hear
that Stanford had just closed the campus, suspended classes, and ordered all
the students to return home. At that time there was just one student who had
just contracted the coronavirus.
The next week was supposed to be the last week of
classes. Students in my course were preparing for their end-of-term project
presentations on Tuesday and their project demonstrations and burrito
celebration on Thursday. It was not to be. Their projects - in the final stages
of completion - sat suspended, presentations were given by video or Zoom in the
following weeks, and final reports were submitted late. Even though the student
teams did well and received excellent grades, it was a disappointing and
frustrating end of the course for everyone.
Looking ahead to the next academic year, there are still
many uncertainties. The university must make some tough decisions. These
following options are being considered:
- To limit the number of students on campus, dorms, and classrooms the
current plan is to allow only half the undergraduates on-site each quarter. In
the Winter Quarter when the class is run; Juniors, Seniors, and graduate
students will be allowed on campus.
- Most courses will be run online. On campus classes will include both
on-campus and online students tele-learning from all over the
world.
- There will likely be limited access to university resources such as
the PRL shop where students fabricate their projects.
- However, there is a real
possibility that all classes will be remote this coming academic quarter
starting September 14th.
All these considerations have impacted my course
planning for the coming year. Here are my current thoughts:
- I do not think it would be safe for students to work on projects
in-person with community members with disabilities or older adults on projects
due to the risk of transmitting the virus. Interaction by Zoom, email, or
telephone would be more appropriate.
- I am not sure how an on-campus or online student teams would work
safely together on projects and maintain physical distancing. I think it may be
best to have individual students work on smaller scaled-back projects,
resulting in a CAD design or a low-resolution minimally functional prototype,
especially if PRL shop access is limited.
- It is unclear how best I should organize and teach a course where
some students attend the class in-person and others attend online. Options
include some combination of in-class recorded lectures, pre-recorded videos,
and discussion sessions using Zoom. It would also be unsafe for community
members to sit in on classroom lectures. My current plan is to present lectures
on-line by Zoom, recording them for viewing by students who are unable to
attend in real-time. Students will also be required to watch videos of guest
lecture sessions from previous years. I will certainly invite people from the
community to join the Zoom lectures.
- Some lecture sessions that will have to be eliminated include
in-class project pitches, field trips, movie night, mid-term project
presentations, the Assistive Technology Faire (although an online version may
be possible), and the end-of-term project demonstrations.
- The scaled-back projects
and loss of some of the lecture sessions lead me to consider having the course
"meet" just one day a week instead of Tuesdays and Thursdays and reducing the
credit units for projects from 3 to 2.
In preparation for the upcoming Winter course offering,
I would like to start to solicit projects suggestions from you. Given the
situation, here are some criteria to consider:
- Suggestions must address a real problem experienced by a community
member with a disability or older adult. The project must address a challenge
that is not adequately served by existing products. (Perform an internet search
to verify this.)
- The scale of the project must be such that it could be pursued by a
single student working with limited resources and fabrication facilities. The
project outcome could be a CAD design or a low-resolution prototype that may
not be fully functional. Other acceptable project activities can be found
here.
- Interaction with community members must be electronic only - no
in-person meetings.
- Refer to
Project
Requirements webpage for further information.
Here is an example project suggestion that should guide
your thinking:
Title: |
Improved
Pooper Scooper |
Background: |
The
user is an older adult who relies on a powered wheelchair for her mobility and
her service dog to help her with daily tasks. |
Problem: |
Current
products are bulky, difficult to operate, and are not designed for wheelchair
users. |
Aim: |
Explore
designs for a device that will allow a wheelchair user to effectively clean up
after their service dog while remaining active in their community. |
Design Criteria: |
Compact
to facilitate storage Aesthetic design Easy to retrieve and
store Integrated waste disposal bag Easy to dispose bag Easy to clean
|
Examples of reacher products for inspiration:
Examples of pooper scooper products that are too
bulky:
|
Please contact me with your ideas, questions, comments,
and suggestions - or just to say hello. Please continue to stay safe &
healthy.
Dave Jaffe
Let me know if you wish to be removed from this
list.
To unsubscribe from this newsletter, please email
Dave. |
|